Recent content by Eielson

Are you even trying with this gibberish? As foreign as it may seem to you, most coaches will say positive things about their players. I've had enough swiss cheese for the night. I'll be back tomorrow for 5 minutes to poke holes in another day's worth of hilariously weak complaints.

So you're worried about recruiting over WRs that haven't played, but you want to recruit over our top 100 recruit and our all-SEC freshman at RB. Nothing is being misrepresented. Your logic just has more holes than swiss cheese. I truly wish it was more of a challenge to debunk your complaints.

I'll take that bet.

It's interesting that some are upset we didn't recruit over our returning starters at RB...but also are upset that we are recruiting over our backup WRs.

We'll win our next game. Take it to the bank.

I've tossed out all data analytics and only want to hear about your eye test. Such an excellent hit rate.

I just don't see how we bring in anybody clearly better than what we have without breaking the bank. You either have to offer a lot of money or an opportunity for playing time, and it's hard to pitch a guy on playing time when you went to the CFP and have your top two guys returning. Outside...

We have one RB on the field at a time and are returning our top 2 rushers. A lot of formations require 3-4 WRs and we are most returning 1 key guy if Sategna returns. It's simple math.

It's genuinely hilarious that you continue to say our RB room got less talented after the departure of an upperclassmen that had 21 carries for 68 yards and couldn't beat out the returning RBs you're mocking even when playing through injury. I hope Ott is paying you royalties for being his only...

As with most of your statements, this is blatantly false. Blaylock experienced one injury. Believe it or not, experiencing an injury does not continue in perpetuity. But even if it does, we don't havs all our eggs in 1 RB. There will be at least 5 or 6 on our roster, and they should have...

If X gets hurt and if Blaylock gets hurt and if Hatton isn't any good, then yes, I'll have concerns about our RB room. But that's a lot of ifs...and even then, we might be fine if the blocking is improved. I'd challenge you to name more than a couple of our RBs this century that were valuable...

Sounds like he can play either. Jonah Laulu type.

We've improved at most positions, and if Sategna returns, we didn't get worse at any position other than backup DT. For a 10 win playoff team. If you're complaining right now, your true colors are showing. I have nothing but excitement for next year at this point.

That's literally what was said. That Demarco isn't willing to play a freshman RB...despite the fact that he's done it repeatedly, including our leading rusher from last year. Who said anything about a true freshman as RB1 or 2? We have proven players at those spots returning. Hatton and...

Did you mean to include an advanced stat to counter my stance? The response doesn't otherwise make sense.