Correct, QBR is very different than passer rating (or passer efficiency as it's called in college football).
Also correct that you're in the minority for using the outdated formula created in 1973 when we had limited technology to compute advanced stats.
- Passer rating values a 7 yard throw...
Half this board explained to you the difference between QBR and passer rating, and somehow you still lack the intelligence to understand the difference.
Sandell is returning, so not sure how that's a lie.
I would say that stating Beck's QBR as 37 points higher when it was 16 was a lie, but lies imply intent, and I think you just simply can't handle basic numbers.
I was born in the Tubbs era and was mostly raised in the Sampson era. Outside of a few years with a top 5ish draft pick, the last 20 years have been near impossible to enjoy. Getting dominated in conference play annually and pretending to celebrate tourney selections, which used to be a a...
It's truly hilarious how bad you are with numbers. The difference in QBR was 16, which is a large difference, but not even on the same planet as 37, and it's not accounting for injury. Maybe that's why you think Ole Miss beat us by 45 in your head.
As for the notion that we couldn't beat a...
We wouldn't have needed to, as anybody with half a brain cell can see we would have eaten Beck alive. Beck ended the game with 103 total passing yards against an A&M defense that was worse than ours, and they had 3 points leading into the final 2 minutes. Pretty hard to not be competitive when...
You say that you understand that the run game involves more than just the RB, but you continue to make posts like this that demonstrate that you've yet to grasp the concept.
Nobody is saying we had a good run game this year, but if you don't find 60 yard TD runs against top 5 teams impressive, I'm not sure you'll ever be impressed.
But I do agree with Wichita that none of our RBs are in the conversation for greatest of all time.