Recent content by Eielson

Better than year 1, year 3, year 4, and year 5? We had a roster that was tourney-worthy, but was not in the stratosphere of the top 5 or 6 in conference.

Try reading it a little slower.

I guess I misread. Several on here were saying we'll get worse because we couldn't possibly duplicate our transfer class, ignoring the fact that we've been a 20 +/- 1 win team for 80% of Moser's tenure.

But what about the 4 out of 5 times in the Moser tenure that we've been within a game or two of each other? He gets lucky 80% of the time? We see the same results every year. And they aren't good enough, but they're pretty consistent.

I know you're trying really hard to sound smart. But it's not working.

Our tourney hopes were alive until the final buzzer. Anybody who thinks we weren't playing for anything against Arkansas is beyond help.

Lol yes, he lucked into Lon's roster in year 1, then lucked into *something* year 3, and then lucked into Fears year 4, and then lucked into a transfer portal that almost pushed our overall roster into top 10 in conference. Nobody is happy with being a bubble team, and I don't think anybody...

I don't think you understand what quotes mean.

I can see a world where we continue to stay in the 19-21 win bubble range regardless of talent, but I fail to see how an NIL increase could lead us to being worse overall.

I'm sure they can't care less that you can't care less.

Those "meaningless" final 11 games after the 9 game losing streak put us within 1 possession of the NCAA tournament. Clown post.

You must have stopped paying attention during the 9 game losing streak.

I don't expect it to be worse next year if Denny makes good on his promise regarding funding. And quite frankly, even if status quo funding, we've been within 1-2 games of the same result every year except the second.

Plenty to complain about this year!

Plenty to complain about in the middle of the season. Nothing to complain about late.