Recent content by Eielson

It's truly hilarious how bad you are with numbers. The difference in QBR was 16, which is a large difference, but not even on the same planet as 37, and it's not accounting for injury. Maybe that's why you think Ole Miss beat us by 45 in your head. As for the notion that we couldn't beat a...

We wouldn't have needed to, as anybody with half a brain cell can see we would have eaten Beck alive. Beck ended the game with 103 total passing yards against an A&M defense that was worse than ours, and they had 3 points leading into the final 2 minutes. Pretty hard to not be competitive when...

There is only one CFP semifinals we wouldn't have played competitively, and very well could have won against three of them.

You say that you understand that the run game involves more than just the RB, but you continue to make posts like this that demonstrate that you've yet to grasp the concept.

Nobody is saying we had a good run game this year, but if you don't find 60 yard TD runs against top 5 teams impressive, I'm not sure you'll ever be impressed. But I do agree with Wichita that none of our RBs are in the conversation for greatest of all time.

Malik Nabers is a definite take. Would also like to add Puka.

I think we are all in agreement that they won't BOTH become Barry Sanders. One will be Barry and the other Thurman. And Hatton gives me bigger, faster, stronger Adrian Peterson vibes.

How is there nothing special about a 65 yard touchdown run against a CFP semifinalst or a 43 yard run to ice the game against Tennessee?

While I agree that Blaylock will not become the greatest RB in college football history, it's truly funny how often your arguments shoot themselves in the foot. I'm not sure you could have found a worse player to prove your point. Might wanna check Barry's college career again...

Wild! I thought this was just a random twitter rumor. Definitely a splash hire! TE recruiting should be much easier now, as well as LB and a few other positions.

If we're going to exclude Sawchuk for 120 carries, then we have to acknowledge that most backs with more YPC than X were under 150, thus should also be excluded by your criteria. The reality is that under Demarco, who has certainly left plenty to be desired, we've had a RB in the top half of...

If you're simple minded enough to think that YPC is entirely based on RB and has nothing to do with the other 10 players, fine, but at least be consistent. By the criteria you have set forth, Gray was the top back in conference in BV's first year and Sawchuk was 0.1 YPC from being 2nd in...

This has to be a joke.

Are you even trying with this gibberish? As foreign as it may seem to you, most coaches will say positive things about their players. I've had enough swiss cheese for the night. I'll be back tomorrow for 5 minutes to poke holes in another day's worth of hilariously weak complaints.

So you're worried about recruiting over WRs that haven't played, but you want to recruit over our top 100 recruit and our all-SEC freshman at RB. Nothing is being misrepresented. Your logic just has more holes than swiss cheese. I truly wish it was more of a challenge to debunk your complaints.