Recent content by Eielson

Not to mention, that's not the RB we got. Post-injury, he averaged 3.3 ypc for Cal and 3.2 ypc for us. Anybody who watched him play and still thinks he was our most talented back in years is simply clueless.

Sategna had a great season and Burks shredded the the top 15 defense (Michigan) prior to QB injury and another (Alabama) once the injury had fully healed. I've repeated myself many times, but retention are no different than additions in this era. Sategna very easily could have been drafted or...

I'll reserve judgement at this time, but the chances that Smothers would have fixed our run game last year round to 0. As Wichita stated, he's clearly not as talented as Ott!!

It's amazing that in one post he can praise Ott's talent. In the next post states that a talented RB will fix it. All while said RB ran for a total of 68 yards. The run game involves 11 players at a time, with contributions from multiple coaches. We improved at nearly every position, and...

Some posters on here are truly helpless.

This has been known for months.

The fact age limits have never been implemented is absurd. I think under 25 should he a hard cutoff outside of situations like WW2.

Injuries are part of the game, and by adding the 5th year, you've already accounted for a year of injury. 3 years is plenty of time to play historically.

Lol no

I don't see how playing a year of lacrosse is more of a competitive advantage than playing an extra year of football.

That's not it at all. We have the best LB coach in the coach in the country, who brought a walk-on who used to think he was better off playing lacrosse all the way to all-SEC. Our season does not hinge on him at all. I'm fine with him not getting another year. It doesn't follow the spirit of...

I guess since Wichita has a personality disorder, the mods just assume he can't help it. Otherwise there's no explanation for why this post was edited while mods look the other way while the KU fan clogs every thread with completely unwarranted personal insults.

This. Resources have to be in place to get a good coach that has options. If we found a diamond in the rough, they would either fail...or they would succeed and somebody with resources would come along and poach them after a short run of success. And we're not going to succeed hiring diamond...

I would have to think we've had discussions with our donors and that there is some form of understanding there.

Yeah, I don't know why anybody would do a victory lap with that data. Seems like our record is comparable to the money we spend.