Recent content by SoonerBounce13

how quickly people forget wake forest. The season is still young

I don't think it would be smart and they certainly could obtain him if they wanted. I just don't think you mess up what is working. I'd be ok with shipping chet and some picks but not jdub SGA Dort Jdub Giannis iHART that is an all time lineup

Iowa state beat alcorn state by 64 points…

awful!

fyi, going back and watching some crocker highlights...those uniforms we had in that time frame were so so bad

i'm not sure why but his shot reminds me of tony crockers

he has been pretty disappointing imo. i really thought he would take a major role off the bench this year

would be cool to see him get a ring. He doesn't really fit what the thunder are doing though

Arnold did go from a 47 qbr to a 57 qbr. I'd take a 10 qbr job for mateer over the offseason...

Good post.

i don't think a qbr of 57 is a drastic difference than a qbr of 67. Especially considering the experience factor neither one is acceptable for what OU needs. If it was we wouldn't have gotten rid of arnold because he showed high qbrs at the end of the year. Bottom line is both metrics have...

the one that has mahomes 2 also has dak 1 Looking at the rankings, I'd say passer rating is more accurate for ranking nfl qbs this year. Chiefs haven't been great https://www.espn.com/nfl/stats/player/_/table/passing/sort/QBRating/dir/desc

QBR is just a bunch of mumbo jumbo. GIve me actual stats instead of this confusing mess that relies on computers. Sometimes, most of the time, simpler is better. I would venture to guess that if you sorted by passer rating and then sorted by qbr, the passer rating would reflect more accurately...

How does QBR account for these plays in certain game scenarios? I still prefer qb rating vs qbr when looking at a qb's passing ability. And when doing that, Mateer and arnold are not far apart

it's early