Are all the scandals at other schools going to hurt OU?

boksooner

New member
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Messages
2,128
Reaction score
0
No specific mention of OU, but the excerpt below is a little scary.

NCAA president addresses integrity

...Now Emmert wants the NCAA to take a hard look at whether its penalties are effective enough to stop more from happening.

"We cannot have coaches, administrators, parents or student-athletes sitting out there deciding: 'Is this worth the risk? If I conduct myself in this fashion and I get caught, it's still worth the risk,'" Emmert said. "We don't want those kinds of cost-benefit analyses going on."

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=6278344
 
Some of the same info, with some additional quotes.

http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebask...18/ncaa-president-addresses-integrity-problem

“If I've learned anything in the six months [as NCAA president], the single biggest concern that I have among the threats to the collegiate model is simply the threat of integrity,” Emmert said. “I've heard concerns expressed by people all around the country about the integrity of intercollegiate athletics right now, that people are seeing things that they don't like and that I don't like and that many people are concerned about.

“As they see those things, they extrapolate across a whole enterprise of intercollegiate athletics. On the face of that, that's inherently unfair because the vast majority of what goes on inside intercollegiate athletics is done by people who have extraordinary integrity, have extraordinary concern for their student-athletes, and people who want nothing more than to have intercollegiate athletics be successful in all the ways we all want it to be.

“But there are those occasions where we have people from top to bottom who don't spend enough time and care in the conduct of this business. And we see that while we have an understanding about a lot of our values, sometimes we're lagging in that integrity. We need to be sure that we restore it. We need to make sure that people understand what we stand for. We need to make sure that we're willing to stand up behind that. And when we have people that don't want to conduct themselves consistent with the integrity of these games, we need to be ready to deal with that appropriately.”

Dealing with that appropriately means dropping the hammer in terms of penalties for rule-breakers. As Emmert himself pointed out, punishments need to transmit a “constructive fear” to potential scofflaws.
...
There has been significant cost to the NCAA on the integrity front. The good news is that the president isn’t dodging that fact. The better news is that his enforcement staff has been as active and aggressive as it’s ever been in combating it.

Maybe by the time Emmert takes to the Final Four dais next year, there will be a few more big-time cheaters’ skins nailed to the wall.
 
Last edited:
Are we really at risk at of getting hammered over this Tiny thing? And if so, is it only b/c we were on probation when it happened? I just don't see any punishment we get being enough to keep coaches away, but then again, I guess we really don't know for sure. I just look at other programs, and what I'd consider similiar offenses, and they aren't being put in bad positions. So why are so many people worried about us?
 
Are we really at risk at of getting hammered over this Tiny thing? And if so, is it only b/c we were on probation when it happened? I just don't see any punishment we get being enough to keep coaches away, but then again, I guess we really don't know for sure. I just look at other programs, and what I'd consider similiar offenses, and they aren't being put in bad positions. So why are so many people worried about us?


When you compare Tiny's situation with 'Cam Newton-gate' at Auburn or what Tressel did at Ohio State, it's small potatoes. The NCAA has let Auburn and Ohio State off with a slap on the wrist. If they decide to 'get tough' with us over Tiny, it's time for someone to take them to court again.

If schools aren't afraid to break the rules, it's directly a result of the NCAA moving so slow on USC and pampering Auburn and Ohio State. The NCAA has created this problem.
 
have to agree with MsPS...do something about the rafter in their own eye before the straw in other eyes... when reading about all the mess with the USC's, Auburn's, OSU'S, & etc. of the world, we are small potatoes...
 
Better – and more equitable – enforcement of the rules is a very good and much-needed thing. But as far as college basketball is concerned, the scandals will never end as long as the "one and done" culture exists.
 
Better – and more equitable – enforcement of the rules is a very good and much-needed thing. But as far as college basketball is concerned, the scandals will never end as long as the "one and done" culture exists.

Inconsistency is the biggest fault the NCAA has, and is the biggest reason so much of the crap has occurred. There is nothing clear about what is actually a transgression or violation, nor what the punishment will be when those violations occur. As well, there is no standard of proof by which programs are judged. The NCAA just acts as a moody oligarchy who plays favorites and makes rulings based upon seeming whim. Until they decide to hold themselves to clear standards, they can't expect their members to act accordingly.
 
bout time to demolish and rebuild the NCAA from scratch.
 
Inconsistency is the biggest fault the NCAA has, and is the biggest reason so much of the crap has occurred. There is nothing clear about what is actually a transgression or violation, nor what the punishment will be when those violations occur. As well, there is no standard of proof by which programs are judged. The NCAA just acts as a moody oligarchy who plays favorites and makes rulings based upon seeming whim. Until they decide to hold themselves to clear standards, they can't expect their members to act accordingly.

Sounds like a 15 year old w/ raging PMS. :D
 
Back
Top