College Basketball's Scoring Problem - Grantland article

MichaelM

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2009
Messages
549
Reaction score
5
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id...west-liberty-university-coach-jim-crutchfield

Hurry Up and Wait
Jim Crutchfield's West Liberty University is the fastest offense in college basketball — and they win. So why isn't anyone else trying to catch up?


People often ask Jim Crutchfield to describe his system, and he has nothing to show them. He does not possess any notes, he has never put anything on video, and the only time he spoke at a coaching clinic, it was because he was trying to angle for an exhibition against a nearby Division I team (a game that has yet to be scheduled, and may never be scheduled). Everything he knows about basketball is filed and collated between his graying temples. He is 57 years old, and until he became the head coach at a Division II college in rural West Virginia nine years ago, he was also in charge of the tennis team; he inherited a squad that went 4-23 the year before and graduated most of its starters, and somehow he's molded it into one of the most successful and intriguing programs in the country. These days, he often gazes up at the scoreboard at the end of a game and thinks, How did we put up so many points?

"We didn't play high-risk defense last night, and in the second half we didn't extend to trapping hardly at all," he is telling me. "And yet at the end we still had 95 on the board. We ran the shot clock down in the last few minutes, and we still scored 50 in the second half."

Full story here. Pretty good (and long) read. Covers Billyball a fair bit toward the end.
 
Fantastic piece. Thanks for posting. I love Grantland at times but often I feel it's so contrived.

I think this article really hits the nail on the head. Obviously, it's easy to say "change the shot clock to 30...", but there's more to it. Though the shot clock should indeed be changed, also cut down on the fouling, physical perimeter play, etc. Potentially a hundred other things. But can/will the NCAA ever be capable of it? I seriously doubt it.

Crutchfield is an amazing story, I've been researching his style more. Obviously would like to see him get a chance in D-I and also ample time. But as both he and Tubbs suggested; there's a conservatism with large salaries, schools, tourney's, saving your ass, etc. So it makes sense to play it safe, in general.

And just makes me yearn for Billyball! It wasn't specifically about points and fans saying "uh...I like points...", it was a style, a flair and watching talented players who can all shoot.
 
Back
Top