Probably! This board has lots of different posters and personalities! Believe it or not, we don't all think the same. I can certainly say I've never said anything like that.
I believe you know the answer to your question. What's odd is that if you search this site for "Jurick" you find tons of threads and posts claiming Jurick is just what you guys need. Or needed, rather. I guess now that he signed with OSU, he's not good enough for you...
Does it really matter if OU plays the 150th ranked team or the 250th ranked team? In my opinion OU should win against both teams pretty close to 100% of the time, especially at the LNC.
are we talking about that great white dope who never makes it back to either basket before a shot is taken?
my dead granny is faster than him.
Probably! This board has lots of different posters and personalities! Believe it or not, we don't all think the same. I can certainly say I've never said anything like that.
Of course you didn't Tony! Can we agree that no one here or elsewhere has any idea if this kid is going to pan out?
Exactly.
I know some thought we needed Jurick, but certainly not all.
Just like not all aggie fans thought Prentiss Elliott was a saint.
Who are you a fan of, InExile? Just curious.
Who are you a fan of, InExile? Just curious.
Uh, BOB, you are one that said he'd be perfect for OU. And I never said every single poster on here agreed, just that there was a lot out there.
And folks, you won't find me on the orange boards. You can go for the stoolwater/sheep humper slant all you want.
ON Edit: BOB, maybe not "perfect" but you were definitely wanted the kid.
why do so many damn aggies post here anyways? do they want to be like us that badly?
Uh, BOB, you are one that said he'd be perfect for OU. And I never said every single poster on here agreed, just that there was a lot out there.
And folks, you won't find me on the orange boards. You can go for the stoolwater/sheep humper slant all you want.
ON Edit: BOB, maybe not "perfect" but you were definitely wanted the kid.
Good point. If the kid can play and improve our current talent level then I would be pleased to have him. If he can't keep his nose clean then he will be gone. Problem is, with our program in such disarray we will be forced to take some chances on kids nobody wants or who have a past. Hopefully Jeff is better at choosing the correct ones than he has been in the past.
Are you sure you don't have me confused with somebody else? I don't follow recruiting AT ALL so I wouldn't know whether we needed him or not.
I may have said he sounded like a perfect fit based on size and the fact somebody said he was athletic. Considering the shape of our program, if you or I met this qualification we may have been perfect recruits, too.
It's possible I'm confused. It's possible I made it up.
Either way we agree that the people that follow recruiting that closely are crazy.
(that's what you meant, right? <winkythingy>)
Here is my comment on Jurick, that I was able to find:
If you can infer this meant I thought Jurick was "perfect", then you may need to take a reading comprehension class.
FWIW, my comment was in reply to somebody mentioning Jurick had baggage at Tennessee.
As mentioned earlier, I don't follow recruiting closely enough to ever state definitively somebody would be must get or something like that.