Nancy Mulkey

sybarite

New member
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Messages
15,546
Reaction score
0
Box Score:

Cypress Woods 79
SA Wagner 60

SA Wagner did not submit stats to MaxPreps. Thus, we don't see the numbers on Ramirez.

http://www.maxpreps.com/games/girls...vs-wagner/3-6-2015-UDkLNW51MUittSLGNlyEgQ.htm

Box Score:

Cypress Woods 57
Dallas Skyline 49

http://www.maxpreps.com/games/girls...s-skyline/3-7-2015-TdHyR5k-sES8oHY8fLaUwg.htm

Notice the difference between the first and third quarters vs the second and fourth quarters, most of which Nancy sat out with fouls. It was basically 42-18 with Mulkey, 15-31 without her. These are not exact, but close.
 
I have said most of what can be said about Nancy. I think there is one player in this class that has the potential to change women's basketball, much as Courtney or Griner did, but in a different way. I think Nancy can be the player who turns the post into a defensive position.

Offensively, Nancy can shoot. She can probably shoot the three about as well as any guard that we have. She is very good at free throws. She was six for six in the state tournament last year. She has a deadly ten to twenty-foot jump shot. She can put back rebounds. She can score any number of ways. But, that is not how I see her becoming a superstar or taking OU to the next level.

When Nancy is in the game, she just disrupts everything. She doesn't need to do much. Others panic around her. They shoot absurd shots, try some unique shots trying to shoot over her or around her. They also tend to shoot more from outside. She affects the game psychologically. Does she have the ability to alter it via her skills?

Yes. She has the best hands that I have seen on a post since Courtney, maybe even better. She can take the ball out of the air with one hand, either from a pass or block, and she can control it with one hand. She has a gentle touch, a controlling touch. She can move from one side of the lane to block shots on either side of the lane by simply shifting her weight. She doesn't need to take steps. She will stuff a shot on the right side of the lane and the left side of the lane with one or two seconds, without doing anything other than shifting weight. She is more agile than people suspect. I saw one notice posted today which addressed her as having good footwork. She does. She is not awkward out there. Her biggest problem is staying out of the way of those who become awkward in her presence.

In the finals against Skyline, they must have shot about fifty to sixty percent with Nancy on the bench. With her on the floor, Skyline probably shot about fifteen to twenty percent. IT was approximately 42-18 with Nancy, and 15-31 without her.

Although Nancy has been selected twice for the USA U-16 teams, that really isn't her forte. She isn't a playground star. She operates best as a part of a team where the flow can go around her. She is a great passer on offense. She is capable of presenting opportunities for fast breaks on defense. She played, but she wasn't dominant in the playground environment.

She turned the freshman forward, Reese, of Cypress Woods into a star. They would take silly shots avoiding Nancy. Reese rebounded underneath the rim, and they were off running. What I didn't see a lot of was passing to Nancy, even at the high post. Everyone wanted to score. She did bring the ball up once against pressure and took a jumper from about the top of the free throw circle--swish. She can do that. She turns a team into a force, and she is the leader of the team.

It was interesting watching the time outs. Cypress Woods players listened to her more than their coach. When she fouled out, the team was headed back out to the floor. She called them over, and they came back over for about fifteen seconds to listen to her before going out to try to hold off Skyline. She was the leader.

There was one official who called some very biased fouls on Nancy to get her into trouble.

If Nancy can dominate in a team game the way that she did in highschool, OU will be very, very good. I think we have much better talent to surround her than we had when we had Courtney, and they fit. She needs to play high post on offense with EJ or Vivi or someone hanging out near the basket for some obvious dishes (I would have thought that Cox would have recognized that opportunity). She can make a power forward into a star. She can operate at high post and let mobile guards operate around her. If they don't come out on her, she can hit the jumper. I think having Peyton or a clone of Peyton, Maddie, perhaps Chelsea and Anna will be fantastic.

Nancy is the one player who could have that influence. Now, let's hope that she settles in.

Incidentally, she isn't weak or too thin. She may rip the ball away from a defender on a rebound.
 
Terrific analysis, Syb.

I am really excited about both Nancy and Chelsea. It will be fun watching as they get to OU and we see them on the court.

It may well take a year or so after Nancy gets here for her to develop all her skills. It took Griner a while if we all recall. She was good as a freshman - but got progressively better over the years. But the sky is the limit I believe.
 
I have said most of what can be said about Nancy. I think there is one player in this class that has the potential to change women's basketball, much as Courtney or Griner did, but in a different way. I think Nancy can be the player who turns the post into a defensive position.

Offensively, Nancy can shoot. She can probably shoot the three about as well as any guard that we have. She is very good at free throws. She was six for six in the state tournament last year. She has a deadly ten to twenty-foot jump shot. She can put back rebounds. She can score any number of ways. But, that is not how I see her becoming a superstar or taking OU to the next level.

When Nancy is in the game, she just disrupts everything. She doesn't need to do much. Others panic around her. They shoot absurd shots, try some unique shots trying to shoot over her or around her. They also tend to shoot more from outside. She affects the game psychologically. Does she have the ability to alter it via her skills?

Yes. She has the best hands that I have seen on a post since Courtney, maybe even better. She can take the ball out of the air with one hand, either from a pass or block, and she can control it with one hand. She has a gentle touch, a controlling touch. She can move from one side of the lane to block shots on either side of the lane by simply shifting her weight. She doesn't need to take steps. She will stuff a shot on the right side of the lane and the left side of the lane with one or two seconds, without doing anything other than shifting weight. She is more agile than people suspect. I saw one notice posted today which addressed her as having good footwork. She does. She is not awkward out there. Her biggest problem is staying out of the way of those who become awkward in her presence.

In the finals against Skyline, they must have shot about fifty to sixty percent with Nancy on the bench. With her on the floor, Skyline probably shot about fifteen to twenty percent. IT was approximately 42-18 with Nancy, and 15-31 without her.

Although Nancy has been selected twice for the USA U-16 teams, that really isn't her forte. She isn't a playground star. She operates best as a part of a team where the flow can go around her. She is a great passer on offense. She is capable of presenting opportunities for fast breaks on defense. She played, but she wasn't dominant in the playground environment.

She turned the freshman forward, Reese, of Cypress Woods into a star. They would take silly shots avoiding Nancy. Reese rebounded underneath the rim, and they were off running. What I didn't see a lot of was passing to Nancy, even at the high post. Everyone wanted to score. She did bring the ball up once against pressure and took a jumper from about the top of the free throw circle--swish. She can do that. She turns a team into a force, and she is the leader of the team.

It was interesting watching the time outs. Cypress Woods players listened to her more than their coach. When she fouled out, the team was headed back out to the floor. She called them over, and they came back over for about fifteen seconds to listen to her before going out to try to hold off Skyline. She was the leader.

There was one official who called some very biased fouls on Nancy to get her into trouble.

If Nancy can dominate in a team game the way that she did in highschool, OU will be very, very good. I think we have much better talent to surround her than we had when we had Courtney, and they fit. She needs to play high post on offense with EJ or Vivi or someone hanging out near the basket for some obvious dishes (I would have thought that Cox would have recognized that opportunity). She can make a power forward into a star. She can operate at high post and let mobile guards operate around her. If they don't come out on her, she can hit the jumper. I think having Peyton or a clone of Peyton, Maddie, perhaps Chelsea and Anna will be fantastic.

Nancy is the one player who could have that influence. Now, let's hope that she settles in.

Incidentally, she isn't weak or too thin. She may rip the ball away from a defender on a rebound.

Nice post. Coach Coale landed a big fish.
 
I haven't seen Nancy play in person and have only seen her on film a little. I have talked to some people that have seen her play numerous times in person and I believe they know quite a bit about the girls game.

They told me she is and will be a program changer. They don't understand the lack of crazy hype regarding her coming to this program. I think I see the potential they tell me about, but will wait to see her play more.

They way my friends talked they were shocked she was going to OU and not UConn. I guess we will all find out. I am just glad she signed and can't wait to see her play.

I don't know a lot about Dungee. I have heard very different takes (by people that have seen her play a bunch) on her ability and potential.

But she is highly rated and because she signed, we will get to find out for ourselves. Never put anything past a kid. My guess is that she will become whatever she is willing to pay the price to become.

Good job Sherri and staff.
 
Syb excellent post, you saw exactly what I saw, and you covered every thing well. I don't think I have been this excited about an OU player since Leah Rush.
 
Syb, I am curious as to just how much can we as OU fans expect to see from Mulkey next year? What is the percentage of the time that she gets into foul trouble and has to sit for extended periods?

And are we likely to see a lot of it when she joins the Sooners?
 
Syb, I am curious as to just how much can we as OU fans expect to see from Mulkey next year? What is the percentage of the time that she gets into foul trouble and has to sit for extended periods?

And are we likely to see a lot of it when she joins the Sooners?

At this point, we can't know. We are looking at a high school player. How rapidly will she adjust? How rapidly can a team adjust to her?

I've only seen her in two complete games, the state semi-finals and finals. She fouled quickly in both to get two fouls. In the first, she committed no further fouls. In the finals, she fouled out. I think the officiating was a bit specific to her. They permitted a lot of rough play, but she was called for a touch foul a couple of times. I don't know how they will call fouls on her in college.

If Nancy is college ready, I would think the idea would be to play her as much as possible. She operates best in a team format. I think she will function better, as will the team, once they are familiar with what she can do. I think that Sherri could protect her a bit by never putting her at the low post on offense until she gets a little experience.

You have seen how Maddie's long arms can control an area. She can just reach up and snare a pass or shot attempt. Well, Nancy is seven inches taller, and her arms reach even higher. If you shoot a jump shot in front of her, she is eye level without jumping, and her arms are longer.

Some phases of the game will be easy. She is a good free throw shooter, unlike most tall posts. She, as indicated by HoopGurlz or Prospect Nation, has good footwork. She isn't as easy to push around as people think. She is accustomed to being shoved, but her shoulder are too high to shove out of the picture.

With people who are good passers on the floor, like Maddie,, Penzo, Peyton, Gabbi---Nancy is a very good passer. They could have a passing game that never reaches down to the floor. That is one very positive thing about Nancy. She goes up with the ball rather than to put it on the floor as a rule.

If we expect a finished product, she won't be. If we realize that she is something different, something that the other team will have problems with and design our approach to protect her and take advantage of her assets, she could play a role rather quickly.
 
Back
Top