NCAA says "no" to Baylor's new unis

deejay1

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
182
Reaction score
19
Baylor's 'Sic 'Em' jerseys out


Updated: March 12, 2014, 5:22 PM ET

By Paul Lukas | ESPN.com

When adidas unveiled its new March Madness uniforms last week, the two designs that generated the most chatter were Baylor's home and road uniforms, which had "Sic 'Em Bears" on the chest.

Apparently those designs caught the NCAA's attention, too.

Baylor announced via Twitter on Wednesday afternoon that the team will not be permitted to wear the "Sic 'Em" jerseys:


Baylor Basketball @BaylorMBB

Baylor will not wear "Sic 'Em Bears" uniforms in postseason. NCAA ruled only team name or mascot can be on front.




A Baylor spokesperson said the team will wear its regular-season uniforms during the postseason. The school has six designs to choose from: white, gold, green, black, neon yellow, and neon yellow with sleeves. The uniforms will be chosen on a game-by-game basis, with white being worn for Wednesday's Big 12 conference tournament game against TCU.

While the move has already generated some amusement on social media (several people have asked if the NCAA could also ban the jerseys' sleeves and highlighter-yellow color scheme), it also feels like a significant line in the sand.

Many observers have complained in recent years that sportswear companies like adidas, and the leagues they do business with, have been using high-profile sporting events as little more than excuses to create and sell ever more outrageous uniform designs. The Baylor news shows that there are some lines the NCAA isn't willing to cross, at least for now.

The NCAA has a long history of fairly conservative rulings relating to basketball uniforms. As noted in ESPN's new "30 for 30" film, "Untucked," Marquette's untucked jerseys from the late 1970s eventually led to an NCAA rule requiring that all jerseys be tucked.
 
Do these jerseys really represent a threat to college athletics, basketball or society as a whole that they need to be banned?

I am fairly traditional and don't really like these new jerseys but I find it odd that we need to impose rules prohibiting them.
 
Do these jerseys really represent a threat to college athletics, basketball or society as a whole that they need to be banned?

I am fairly traditional and don't really like these new jerseys but I find it odd that we need to impose rules prohibiting them.

I'm fine with banning anything but the university name or mascot. it would eventually transfor into some pretty idiotic stuff
 
12972399465_1f32601866.jpg
 
I would prefer the NCAA ban itself from collegiate athletics
 
I guess nobody at Adidas or Baylor bothered to ask if it was ok to have Sic 'Em on their jerseys? Seems like something you'd get cleared first.
 
So no Boomer Sooner jerseys for OU I guess.

Not sure if want... but also not sure if don't want.

If we were with Under Armour or adidas, I was definitely not want, but Nike seems to get that some schools like to be traditional and not outrageous
 
Back
Top