Pac-10 is 2-0 in first round against Big East teams..

thebigabd

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
13,496
Reaction score
77
Pac-10 was getting crap for possibly being a 1-bid league and here they are winning... Pretty good showing thus far for the Pac-10.
 
What stinks about the whole argument is that West Va, Nova, Syracuse, and Pittsburgh can all still go deep into this tournament. Now the depth of the confrence was overated this year. The Big 12 really showed well and Texas and OSU had their chances to win their games. Just need Kansas, Kansas State, Baylor, and Texas A&M to keep winning....anything Missouri does here on out is gravy for the Big 12.
 
Yep...i picked both Big East Teams...they bamboozled me...

Turns out that the Big East isnt quite the powerhouse conference that it was supposed to be, with only WV, Syracuse and Villanova advancing to the second round...
 
Anybody who watched them play knows Washington and Cal are very good teams with fabulous coaches.

Especially Cal with Mike Montgomery. If they are on Duke is in trouble. I would love to see a Cal/Baylor regional final.
 
Yep...i picked both Big East Teams...they bamboozled me...

Turns out that the Big East isnt quite the powerhouse conference that it was supposed to be, with only WV, Syracuse and Villanova advancing to the second round...

Pitt lost to Oakland? All 4 of the Big East teams left could go real deep.
 
It all just shows no conference should get more than 5 teams in the dance. Having said that the Pac-10 really did only deserve 2 teams. ASU did not deserve a bid after getting wiped by Stanford in the Pac-10 tournament.
 
ASU deserved to be there as much as Georgia Tech. No team should be there with a losing conference record no matter how good their conference might be....and the ACC was not one of the better conferences this year.
 
Back
Top