2025-26 schedule information

[BoulderSooner]

I give them a pass on ORU. Always good to play Tulsa and ORU.

With that said, how did oru fall off? NIL I’m guessing. Historically never really high but I would think 150-250 range and jump up years like with Max.

I agree with that .. as a 1 off ..

 

[CoachTalk]

I give them a pass on ORU. Always good to play Tulsa and ORU.

With that said, how did oru fall off? NIL I’m guessing. Historically never really high but I would think 150-250 range and jump up years like with Max.

Oru nil is near the top of their conf.

Bad coaching lately and kids leaving for more NIL but they should be in the top of their conf yearly.

 

[CoachTalk]

Well, I take it back. It’s just not on the team page. I’ll put out all of it, even the known games

11/4 vs St. Francis
11/8 vs Gonzaga (neutral)
11/11 vs Arkansas Pine-Bluff
11/15 vs Nebraska (neutral)
11/20 vs Oral Roberts
11/28 vs Marquette (neutral)
12/2 at Wake Forest
12/6 vs Arizona State (neutral)
12/13 vs Oklahoma State (neutral)

I guess I only didn’t know about APB and ORU.

This schedule plus 7 cupcakes is FINE!

Sec top 2 conference. I get it for the season ticket holders. That’s about it

SEC

 

[Skeeter1]

7 P4 games and you're still complaining...?

she complains about everything. Typical. Boomer

 

[WichitaSooner]

This schedule plus 7 cupcakes is FINE!

Sec top 2 conference. I get it for the season ticket holders. That’s about it

SEC

It’s a good thing you aren’t a college coach if you actually think this. Also, is there a single thing you would actually criticize Moser for? It’s ok to think critically and objectively every now and then.

 

[skyvue]

This schedule plus 7 cupcakes is FINE!

Sec top 2 conference. I get it for the season ticket holders. That’s about it

SEC

But from your POV, what would be the problem with playing teams 150 spots higher instead? We'd still win those games and it would boost our schedule strength a bit, which never hurts. What possible upside is there to playing teams in the 300s?

 

[CoachTalk]

But from your POV, what would be the problem with playing teams 150 spots higher instead? We'd still win those games and it would boost our schedule strength a bit, which never hurts. What possible upside is there to playing teams in the 300s?

Guessing you gotta pay those team 3-4x as much to show up. I also feel it’s fine for new teams to gel
Vs bad teams.

If you remember correctly it worked last year. Our non conference wins got us In.
If we slip up vs 120-210 team we don’t get in.

Bad wins are better than good losses in non conf.

 

[WichitaSooner]

Guessing you gotta pay those team 3-4x as much to show up. I also feel it’s fine for new teams to gel
Vs bad teams.

If you remember correctly it worked last year. Our non conference wins got us In.
If we slip up vs 120-210 team we don’t get in.

Bad wins are better than good losses in non conf.

Wrong again. Wins against 300 teams have zero value. We made the tournament because of the wins against teams like Michigan and Arizona and Louisville. The rest of the noncon schedule has no value whatsoever as far as making the field. The only thing it did was shrink our margin of error because it meant we couldn’t afford any slip ups against the good teams.

And please stop with the “new teams need time to gel” argument. Every team in America is new every season in this era, but plenty of coaches avoid loading up on bottom 50 teams.

 

[skyvue]

Guessing you gotta pay those team 3-4x as much to show up. I also feel it’s fine for new teams to gel
Vs bad teams.

If you remember correctly it worked last year. Our non conference wins got us In.
If we slip up vs 120-210 team we don’t get in.

Bad wins are better than good losses in non conf.

I agree with the gel-ing aspect, but I think that can happen just as easily against #150-200. It might even happen more readily against those teams. I mean, we could (warning: ridiculous example follows) play high school teams and absolutely be assured of winning, but what would they gain from the experience? I think they gain more from playing mid-level teams--both in terms of growing as a team and for schedule strength.