Aaliyah Wilson

[SoonerNorm]

My vote is still for Katelyn Levings as the best player in the state, Freshman or not.

She has certainly been turning heads. She's another one I want to watch play soon.

 

[sybarite]

I'm not questioning her character by saying she doesn't like the game. I'm telling you what I've seen and what was told to me. Also it's not a lie about a her standing on the wing....maybe the coaching staff will demand her to get closer to the basket but she will sit near the 3 point line. Wish you knew TK the way i do because he has said the same thing. He's a coach on the sooner staff but have mentioned it.....so i guess he's a liar.

I've said before you can't teach 6'9" so yes you take her as a project but she isn't a game changer.

Bottom line is you are one who thinks you and yours can do no wrong when in reality we all can be wrong.

I have seen her in two complete games and several partial. I have never seen her stand at the three point line. Well, I did, one time---for about ten seconds.

You went after her character, and you told an outright lie. Why?

 

[Mac]

Really? How so? Just Curious

Just a gut feeling 6'3 guards don't grow on trees...

 

[Sweetest OU Girl]

My vote is still for Katelyn Levings as the best player in the state, Freshman or not.

Where does she play, Mac?

 

[Mac]

Where does she play, Mac?

My Math was off, I think she's only a 8th grader... I'm still not impressed by Wilson tho.

 

[sybarite]

My Math was off, I think she's only a 8th grader... I'm still not impressed by Wilson tho.

Why? I've given reasons that I question Wilson's capabilities. I could be wrong. I just saw something that caused uncertainty.

 

[skilledserv]

I have seen her in two complete games and several partial. I have never seen her stand at the three point line. Well, I did, one time---for about ten seconds.

You went after her character, and you told an outright lie. Why?

Never told a lie.....again you saw 2 games and highlights. To me you have nothing to stand on here so just wait till you can watch her.

 

[sybarite]

Never told a lie.....again you saw 2 games and highlights. To me you have nothing to stand on here so just wait till you can watch her.

I disagree. So, be quiet.

 

[Sweetest OU Girl]

http://prospectsnation.com/story/two-elite-150-members-make-decisions-monday

According to this article she will announce her decision Monday.
Finalists KU, Arkansas, Rutgers, Texas A&M

That's an interesting list. Does anyone know why she came down to those finalists? All but Rutgers have men as head coach. Do you think she prefers to play for a male instead of a female coach?

 

[skilledserv]

I disagree. So, be quiet.

Lol....i swear you have to be 17 or 18 years old. You might be happy to be in the top 25, but others are trying to win championships.

Guess i should be quiet when talking to you......we aren't talking about the same thing which makes the conversation boring.

 

[sybarite]

Thank you. I would love to be 17 again. But, I am certain that you are wrong.

I can remember Sherri saying that she has seen someone one time and known that she had to sign her, on more than one occasion. The good coaches know talent when they see it. It doesn't take a bunch of times to see what they want to see.

But, then, someone who actually does for a job, that someone thinks enough of to pay a half million or more to coach, know what they are looking for. It may not be the one who scores. It may not be the one who looks good in a pickup game. It may be the one who has one attribute that can be utilized, or that indicates the talent level of a kid.

I'm not a scout. But, in one or two games, I could tell a coach what I have seen that might be of value, something that I have noticed as a strength or weakness. I don't have to have a final evaluation. That is the coach''s job. From what I have heard, most coaches use the "scouts" simply as a source of names. They do their own evaluation based on what actually works.

You can't tell that after two games? They can, often after two minutes.

 

[skilledserv]

Thank you. I would love to be 17 again. But, I am certain that you are wrong.

I can remember Sherri saying that she has seen someone one time and known that she had to sign her, on more than one occasion. The good coaches know talent when they see it. It doesn't take a bunch of times to see what they want to see.

But, then, someone who actually does for a job, that someone thinks enough of to pay a half million or more to coach, know what they are looking for. It may not be the one who scores. It may not be the one who looks good in a pickup game. It may be the one who has one attribute that can be utilized, or that indicates the talent level of a kid.

I'm not a scout. But, in one or two games, I could tell a coach what I have seen that might be of value, something that I have noticed as a strength or weakness. I don't have to have a final evaluation. That is the coach''s job. From what I have heard, most coaches use the "scouts" simply as a source of names. They do their own evaluation based on what actually works.

You can't tell that after two games? They can, often after two minutes.

First thing you have said that i agree with......with that being said..................... You made my point.

 

[sybarite]

First thing you have said that i agree with......with that being said..................... You made my point.

What? Your point that you need more than two games,, when it appears that a coach doesn't need it?

 

[soonerstar]

Which team did Wilson pick?

 

[SoonerNorm]

Which team did Wilson pick?

I haven't heard that she has made a decision.

 

[SoonerNorm]

She will announce tomorrow.

 

[jerry]

She will announce tomorrow.

2 pm any news yet??

 

[O-State2009]

Arkansas per ESPN & Twitter

 

[SOONERGRAD]

Arkansas it is