Well, if the picks are accurate, it clearly proves one thing beyond any doubt: Sherri is by far the top game coach in the conference. Marginal players, not a single top notch player, etc. Yet she finished a very clear 3rd in the conference.
Think about what the coaches said. Almost every team in the conference had better players. Yet the only ones who could finish above Sherri's team had nearly a whole team of better players. And even many of those below had better players.
There is one quite puzzling thing in all this. If all these players are better, how in the world did Vivi end up above many of them in almost every statistical category? Maybe what you actually do on the court is weighed less than other factors? What? I thought it was about what you do, rather than what you wish was true.
Actually, if you think just for a moment, it becomes clear what this is all about. As you think about it, ask yourself why Nebraska, Colorado, A&M, etc. left the Big-12 high and dry.
