Amazing what happens when they shoot half as many free throws. That officiating crew should be suspended for the year.
Exactly. KSU did not play a great game against us at all. They hit 12 legitimate shots the entire game (they hit 13 only if you count the one that was after the buzzer). They shot 26.5%.
We didn't play great, it's true, but if the game had been officiated in even reasonable fashion, with the home team, as is the norm, getting a few more foul calls/free throws than the visitors, we win by 8 to 10 points.
Give KSU 25 free throws (still a generous number) instead of 36 and award us just five more from the charity stripe, and we win 60-51. And that's with both teams shooting the same percentages, from the field and from the line, they shot on Saturday. Take away the bogus three-pointer and let Ryan Spangler play the final 12 minutes, and the game's not even close.
I know, I know -- "If ifs and buts were candy and nuts ..." -- but my point is that, if both teams played exactly as they did in that game, but the officials were at all competent, we win by 10 points or more. It wasn't that we played terrible (we didn't play great) or that KSU played well (they didn't) -- the actions of the officials decided that game.
Bad officiating stifles the team that is getting leaned on -- it can't play with the abandon it takes to win on the road, and it begins to force things on offense -- but even if we hadn't played any better (and I believe we would have), we still would have won easily with officiating that was a little more evenhanded.