Nice job conservatives!

coolm

New member
Joined
Nov 7, 2008
Messages
8,694
Reaction score
0
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/the...eader-in-child-poverty/#.VTQ9G3gpEpM.facebook

America’s wealth grew by 60 percent in the past six years, by over $30 trillion. In approximately the same time, the number of homeless children has also grown by 60 percent.

Financier and CEO Peter Schiff said, “People don’t go hungry in a capitalist economy.” The 16 million kids on food stamps know what it’s like to go hungry. Perhaps, some in Congress would say, those children should be working. “There is no such thing as a free lunch,” insisted Georgia Representative Jack Kingston, even for schoolkids, who should be required to “sweep the floor of the cafeteria” (as they actually do at a charter school in Texas).

The callousness of U.S. political and business leaders is disturbing, shocking. Hunger is just one of the problems of our children. Teacher Sonya Romero-Smith told about the two little homeless girls she adopted: “Getting rid of bedbugs, that took us a while. Night terrors, that took a little while. Hoarding food..”

America is a ‘Leader’ in Child Poverty

The U.S. has one of the highest relative child poverty rates in the developed world. As UNICEF reports, “[Children’s] material well-being is highest in the Netherlands and in the four Nordic countries and lowest in Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and the United States.”

Over half of public school students are poor enough to qualify for lunch subsidies, and almost half of black children under the age of six are living in poverty.

$5 a Day for Food, But Congress Thought it was Too Much.

Nearly half of all food stamp recipients are children, and they averaged about $5 a day for their meals before the 2014 farm bill cut $8.6 billion (over the next ten years) from the food stamp program.

In 2007 about 12 of every 100 kids were on food stamps. Today it’s 20 of every 100.

For Every 2 Homeless Children in 2006, There Are Now 3

On a typical frigid night in January, 138,000 children, according to the U.S. Department of Housing, were without a place to call home.

That’s about the same number of households that have each increased their wealth by $10 million per year since the recession.

The US: Near the Bottom in Education, and Sinking

The U.S. ranks near the bottom of the developed world in the percentage of 4-year-olds in early childhood education. Early education should be a primary goal for the future, as numerous studies have shown that pre-school helps all children to achieve more and earn more through adulthood, with the most disadvantaged benefiting the most. But we’re going in the opposite direction. Head Start was recently hit with the worst cutbacks in its history.

Children’s Rights? Not in the U.S.

It’s hard to comprehend the thinking of people who cut funding for homeless and hungry children. It may be delusion about trickle-down, it may be indifference to poverty, it may be resentment toward people unable to “make it on their own.”

The indifference and resentment and disdain for society reach around the globe. Only two nations still refuse to ratify the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: South Sudan and the United States. When President Obama said, “I believe America is exceptional,” he was close to the truth, in a way he and his wealthy friends would never admit.
 
Something is seriously wrong with you. Democrats controlled the government for the last six years and have controlled Congress for eight years.


What that article says is since the 2006 mid term elections when Democrats took over Congress things have gooten really bad for children. The Republicans did not have the political power to pass a single bill. The Republicans cannot override a veto today. It as if you live in a bubble with no clue of reality.
 
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/the...eader-in-child-poverty/#.VTQ9G3gpEpM.facebook

America’s wealth grew by 60 percent in the past six years, by over $30 trillion. In approximately the same time, the number of homeless children has also grown by 60 percent.

Financier and CEO Peter Schiff said, “People don’t go hungry in a capitalist economy.” The 16 million kids on food stamps know what it’s like to go hungry. Perhaps, some in Congress would say, those children should be working. “There is no such thing as a free lunch,” insisted Georgia Representative Jack Kingston, even for schoolkids, who should be required to “sweep the floor of the cafeteria” (as they actually do at a charter school in Texas).

The callousness of U.S. political and business leaders is disturbing, shocking. Hunger is just one of the problems of our children. Teacher Sonya Romero-Smith told about the two little homeless girls she adopted: “Getting rid of bedbugs, that took us a while. Night terrors, that took a little while. Hoarding food..”

America is a ‘Leader’ in Child Poverty

The U.S. has one of the highest relative child poverty rates in the developed world. As UNICEF reports, “[Children’s] material well-being is highest in the Netherlands and in the four Nordic countries and lowest in Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and the United States.”

Over half of public school students are poor enough to qualify for lunch subsidies, and almost half of black children under the age of six are living in poverty.

$5 a Day for Food, But Congress Thought it was Too Much.

Nearly half of all food stamp recipients are children, and they averaged about $5 a day for their meals before the 2014 farm bill cut $8.6 billion (over the next ten years) from the food stamp program.

In 2007 about 12 of every 100 kids were on food stamps. Today it’s 20 of every 100.

For Every 2 Homeless Children in 2006, There Are Now 3

On a typical frigid night in January, 138,000 children, according to the U.S. Department of Housing, were without a place to call home.

That’s about the same number of households that have each increased their wealth by $10 million per year since the recession.

The US: Near the Bottom in Education, and Sinking

The U.S. ranks near the bottom of the developed world in the percentage of 4-year-olds in early childhood education. Early education should be a primary goal for the future, as numerous studies have shown that pre-school helps all children to achieve more and earn more through adulthood, with the most disadvantaged benefiting the most. But we’re going in the opposite direction. Head Start was recently hit with the worst cutbacks in its history.

Children’s Rights? Not in the U.S.

It’s hard to comprehend the thinking of people who cut funding for homeless and hungry children. It may be delusion about trickle-down, it may be indifference to poverty, it may be resentment toward people unable to “make it on their own.”

The indifference and resentment and disdain for society reach around the globe. Only two nations still refuse to ratify the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: South Sudan and the United States. When President Obama said, “I believe America is exceptional,” he was close to the truth, in a way he and his wealthy friends would never admit.

couple of things.

Firstly, how do you, no how can you, blame conservatives for the last 6 years when democrats have controlled the government?

SEcondly, what link do you have for 60% growth in homeless children and what qualifies as a homeless child?
 
I'm beginning to think that coolm was paid by the admins of this board to turn this into a political board and get more traffic lol

I do not like off season coolm lol
 
Something is seriously wrong with you. Democrats controlled the government for the last six years and have controlled Congress for eight years.


What that article says is since the 2006 mid term elections when Democrats took over Congress things have gooten really bad for children. The Republicans did not have the political power to pass a single bill. The Republicans cannot override a veto today. It as if you live in a bubble with no clue of reality.
Now, go back and read the article and see how many times the words, "Democrat" or "Republican" are used in the article. It mentions a name from each party, and has nothing positive to say about either. But, you use this to attack coolm and Democrats? Fixated much?
 
Now, go back and read the article and see how many times the words, "Democrat" or "Republican" are used in the article. It mentions a name from each party, and has nothing positive to say about either. But, you use this to attack coolm and Democrats? Fixated much?

Are you going to bet?

I addressed his title. Apparently as an intellectually superior democrat, you can't read.
 
Are you going to bet?

I addressed his title. Apparently as an intellectually superior democrat, you can't read.

Denver, you have already lost that bet. The title: there are no conservative Democrats? Just the use of the word, conservative, set you off on Democrats?
 
Syb - there's no reason to split hairs. Certainly not on my behalf.

REPUBLICANS foster ill-will for and cut money to food stamp programs. REPUBLICANS propose budgets to cut assistance money targeted at kids while increasing military funding above what the Pentagon requests. REPUBLICANS cut funding to Planned Parenthood in the name of "abortion prevention" despite the Hyde amendments current restriction already in place.

Democrats in control? Really? Did the article or I limit the blame to DC? Not sure how you came to that conclusion ... tunnel vision in your defense? There are a number of states with republican-led legislatures and republican governors. I happen to live in one of the worst offenders. Please attempt to defend Oklahoma's idiocy. I dare you.
 
It's not useful to use the term "conservative" in a policy debate. Just stick to the facts. U.S. Household wealth has increased over $30 trillion to record highs the past 5 years. Federal spending is below the 50 year average in relation to GDP. The federal deficit is below the 50 year average and below targeted levels in relation to GDP.

The U.S. Economy is designed to fund government spending 85% from tax receipts and 15% from the sale of U.S. Treasury notes. Last fiscal year the ratio was 87 to 13. We should be spending a tad more while keeping tax rates where they are. That's how our system has always worked and produced unrivaled innovation. Cutting funding for food stamps and other social safety net programs like Medicaid expansion is not only bad economics, it's mean and unnecessary.
 
Syb - there's no reason to split hairs. Certainly not on my behalf.

REPUBLICANS foster ill-will for and cut money to food stamp programs. REPUBLICANS propose budgets to cut assistance money targeted at kids while increasing military funding above what the Pentagon requests. REPUBLICANS cut funding to Planned Parenthood in the name of "abortion prevention" despite the Hyde amendments current restriction already in place.

Democrats in control? Really? Did the article or I limit the blame to DC? Not sure how you came to that conclusion ... tunnel vision in your defense? There are a number of states with republican-led legislatures and republican governors. I happen to live in one of the worst offenders. Please attempt to defend Oklahoma's idiocy. I dare you.

How long have food stamps existed?

Before the advent of food stamps, did children starve to death?

If the private sector was responsible for feeding those without, then the same amount of money spent by government on this issue today would actually feed more empty or deficient stomachs than otherwise. Either that is a good thing or it isn't.
 
Last edited:
Now, go back and read the article and see how many times the words, "Democrat" or "Republican" are used in the article. It mentions a name from each party, and has nothing positive to say about either. But, you use this to attack coolm and Democrats? Fixated much?

The board thespian in need of an audience is at it once again.
 
I'm beginning to think that coolm was paid by the admins of this board to turn this into a political board and get more traffic lol

I do not like off season coolm lol

I think you mean an individual posing under different aliases and engaging in a two sided self argument with himself just like that is done on other local message boards. It's overtly pathetic. Is it not?
 
How long have food stamps existed?

Before the advent of food stamps, did children starve to death?

If the private sector was responsible for feeding those without, then the same amount of money spent by government on this issue today would actually feed more empty or deficient stomachs than otherwise. Either that is a good thing or it isn't.

The program started in 1939. Prior to the food stamp program poverty rates were much higher and the food industry experienced higher spoilage rates. There's a reason the program is in the agriculture department. The program killed two birds with one stone.

Here's a quote from the first administrator Milo Perkins "We got a picture of a gorge, with farm surpluses on one cliff and under-nourished city folks with outstretched hands on the other. We set out to find a practical way to build a bridge across that chasm."

Again, it's a very successful program and actually lowers the cost of food due to reduced spoilage rates. Cutting it is bad economics. Where do you think the money goes? It goes to grocery stores and farmers and food companies. It grows the economy while making sure those at the bottom who meet the means test don't go hungry. As most government programs it was well thought out and works as planned.
 
The program started in 1939. Prior to the food stamp program poverty rates were much higher and the food industry experienced higher spoilage rates. There's a reason the program is in the agriculture department. The program killed two birds with one stone.

Here's a quote from the first administrator Milo Perkins "We got a picture of a gorge, with farm surpluses on one cliff and under-nourished city folks with outstretched hands on the other. We set out to find a practical way to build a bridge across that chasm."

Again, it's a very successful program and actually lowers the cost of food due to reduced spoilage rates. Cutting it is bad economics. Where do you think the money goes? It goes to grocery stores and farmers and food companies. It grows the economy while making sure those at the bottom who meet the means test don't go hungry. As most government programs it was well thought out and works as planned.

Excuse me, but there is either fraud associated with the program or there is not and any evidence of such is just waste. Secondly, if the program was set up to help those in need of one of life's basic necessities then it should address and focus on that aspect and not the business community itself as the priority should take aim on those in need. A more efficient manner of distributing food would lead to more mouths being fed which should be the overall goal of any assistance provided.
 
Last edited:
The shift from commodities to food stamps was primarily the result of food manufacturers and distributors that wanted a piece of the action. The distribution of a cheese log by the Department of Agriculture didn't profit General Mills.
 
Fraud? The fraud rate in food stamps is just over 1%. I don't think you'll find or devise a more efficient program in that regard.

Where is any explanation that private actors can do a better job? I am not even gonna ask for actual proof.
 
Fraud? The fraud rate in food stamps is just over 1%. I don't think you'll find or devise a more efficient program in that regard.

Where is any explanation that private actors can do a better job? I am not even gonna ask for actual proof.

Less bureaucracy generally equates to less waste. And speaking of food, did you have eggs and hamas this morning?
 
Less bureaucracy generally equates to less waste. And speaking of food, did you have eggs and hamas this morning?

now make sure you factor in excessive bonuses for executives and new restrictions that keep food from getting to kids done in the name of "efficiency".
 
Back
Top