If I recall that was against Texas in early February, but without looking it up I can assure you she did not, since no player from K State or from West Virginia has won any awards this year.
But once 19 of the 32 awards were handed out to 3 Texas based Universities (that is an average of over 6 each), only 13 remained available for the other 7 schools to share (an average of less than 2 each) in the conference.
There is an interesting correlation in Women's basketball between distance from the Big-12 offices and amount of recognition - especially weekly honors - given by the league offices. This not only plays out in terms of honors but also in other forms of recognition and publicity on the conference website. I suspect this is at least part of the reason Texas is still ranked in the top 25 in one poll, and ahead of us in both polls ( in terms of number of votes received). That is obviously not supported by what has happened on the court, as anyone who is well informed knows. But many who vote don't have (or take) the time to investigate things carefully and instead get much of their information from the Big-12 publications.
Iowa State is the exception to the paragraph above, and I wonder if it is due to the big fuss they made about these kinds of seeming discriminations back in the football season.
Nope, that's not my position. I'm simply stating that it has been like that for a while. It's a pattern exists, and I don't know if it's specific to women's basketball. Probably not. There have been some stellar players on subpar teams that do not get POW when it's deserved, simply because their team lost both of the games that week.
