Some thoughts on today's game.....

I see Neal minutes dictated by matchups. Do they play zone? Do they have undersized bigs? I could see him go 15 min one game and possibly not see the floor the next.
 
That was last year. Cam is bigger, stronger this year and he seemed more confident when going after the ball. If OU is going to have any chance of being a good rebounding team they're going to need a bigger, stronger, quicker player at that position or a player that is willing to go get rebounds.

Agree. Not too mention, If players don't get better from one year to the next then your looking at another .500 season...but fortunately that's not the case.
 
I hope you're talking about the arguments in the thread and not the basketball team.

Pretty sure that is what he was talking about Ms Proud....

You know 04 survived the Pumpers vs Doomer and Gloomers during the KS yrs, the epic yr long fight Cheno had with Ireallyloveou, and of course the stuff that started with the JC going or staying debates.


Many of the old original posters from the old hoops board don't post aa much, and I'm sure that is alot of the reason. I miss 04, Trav, Syb, and many of the old crew. Many thought the in fighting would die once everyone was FINALLY happy with a new coach. The truth is in fighting is a big part of every message board I have ever joined.

It gets old sometimes, so you take a break. As much as I enjoy OU Football, and the off topic board, I deleted my acct and stayed away for over 3+ yrs. I recently joined Landthieves and have enjoyed it so far. If it gets tedious again, or becomes something negative I will exit again. If I know 04 like I believe I do, he would rather open threads without the constant fighting between the same old players.....

Just my 2 cents, and I'm not faulting anyone or calling anyone out, just interpreting what I THINK 04 meant.......
 
Last edited:
Interesting SoonerinNC. You really think Grooms has dropped that much?
 
Pretty sure that is what he was talking about Ms Proud....

You know 04 survived the Pumpers vs Doomer and Gloomers during the KS yrs, the epic yr long fight Cheno had with Ireallyloveou, and of course the stuff that started with the JC going or staying debates.


Many of the old original posters from the old hoops board don't post aa much, and I'm sure that is alot of the reason. I miss 04, Trav, Syb, and many of the old crew. Many thought the in fighting would die once everyone was FINALLY happy with a new coach. The truth is in fighting is a big part of every message board I have ever joined.

It gets old sometimes, so you take a break. As much as I enjoy OU Football, and the off topic board, I deleted my acct and stayed away for over 3+ yrs. I recently joined Landthieves and have enjoyed it so far. If it gets tedious again, or becomes something negative I will exit again. If I know 04 like I believe I do, he would rather open threads without the constant fighting between the same old players.....

Just my 2 cents, and I'm not faulting anyone or calling anyone out, just interpreting what I THINK 04 meant.......

I hoped that was what 04 meant, but I just wasn't sure. The childish arguments do get old. I wonder how many posters take a permanent break because they grow tired of the nonsense.
 
Which is worse, posts that are actually arguing about OU basketball, or posts complaining about arguing?

It does get annoying. And I'm going to try and do my part to not get into it with gary. But there isn't a message board out there, especially a sports message board, that doesn't have it, to some degree.
 
In all fairness, 20 posts ago everybody had decided that they agreed with each other and the rest of the thread had been civil and informative until it got derailed again.
:vitale
 
Which is worse, posts that are actually arguing about OU basketball, or posts complaining about arguing?


It does get annoying. And I'm going to try and do my part to not get into it with gary. But there isn't a message board out there, especially a sports message board, that doesn't have it, to some degree.

That would depend on which type of post discourages more people from participating in the conversation.
 
Which is worse, posts that are actually arguing about OU basketball, or posts complaining about arguing?

The difference is, if the former stops, the latter also stops.

The inverse is not true.
 
WT said-"As for Gary being right, Gary wasn't right. I wasn't right. NOBODY was right. Everybody that voiced an opinion about playing time and who should start was right about some stuff, and wrong about some stuff. Nobody nailed it. Not one person predicted the starting lineup we saw last night, until a couple of days ago when it was pretty obvious those guys were going to start. Not one person suggested that lineup during the offseason"

You are correct but I did nail it about 10 days ago when it wasn't obvious to others on this board. I will pat myself on the back!
North Carolina nailed it about Sam being the third point guard on this team. He has improved and is a great kid but the freshman are better. LK is going to play up to 10 guys a game at least early in the season.
Pledger is a great shooter. He struggles in other areas but has improved some and will benefit from the freshman being on this team.
 
WT said-"As for Gary being right, Gary wasn't right. I wasn't right. NOBODY was right. Everybody that voiced an opinion about playing time and who should start was right about some stuff, and wrong about some stuff. Nobody nailed it. Not one person predicted the starting lineup we saw last night, until a couple of days ago when it was pretty obvious those guys were going to start. Not one person suggested that lineup during the offseason"

You are correct but I did nail it about 10 days ago when it wasn't obvious to others on this board. I will pat myself on the back!
North Carolina nailed it about Sam being the third point guard on this team. He has improved and is a great kid but the freshman are better. LK is going to play up to 10 guys a game at least early in the season.
Pledger is a great shooter. He struggles in other areas but has improved some and will benefit from the freshman being on this team.


I didn't make a prediction as to what the starting lineup would be. What I said that seemed to cause so much anger and aggravation was that the starting lineup would be some combination of the starters from the red team and white team from that 1st scrimmage. That seemed to go against the conventional wisdom.

Since the correct answer seems to be trending exactly that way, there appears to be alot of shape shifting going on with some of those critics.
 
I didn't make a prediction as to what the starting lineup would be. What I said that seemed to cause so much anger and aggravation was that the starting lineup would be some combination of the starters from the red team and white team from that 1st scrimmage. That seemed to go against the conventional wisdom.

Since the correct answer seems to be trending exactly that way, there appears to be alot of shape shifting going on with some of those critics.

Yes I know! I have agreed with almost all of your observations. I did predict that lineup with some help from others. Although not in the offseason.
 
Back
Top