the "Owen Field" syndrome

seniorsooner

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
5,168
Reaction score
0
RE: T.J. Taylor

Reminds me of the football board on OUI. When it comes to recruits, when we get them, they're going to be great. When we lose them, they're really not that good, we didn't need them anyway, and we have much better players than them already.
 
RE: T.J. Taylor

Reminds me of the football board on OUI. When it comes to recruits, when we get them, they're going to be great. When we lose them, they're really not that good, we didn't need them anyway, and we have much better players than them already.


I for one don't share that sentiment. This team is bare bones and can't afford to lose anyone. We got walk-ons getting significant minutes in close games. However, if a player doesn't want to stay, for whatever reason, what can you do? I mean, it's not like we get worse, he hasn't played. He might have made us better someday, but that possibility now lies in the realm of the "what-ifs."

Also, I agree that the list of transfers isn't a major cause for alarm. We can't comment on the state of college basketball, with players flying around everywhere, transferring, dropping out and going to play professionally earlier than they should, and then get upset when it is reflected in our program. Should we be happy with it, no, but it's more a reflection on the overinflated ego of today's amateur basketball players than it is an indictment on anyone's coaching. A large majority of them want to be superstars, today, solely through their own raw talent and without coaching or discipline. If a player doesn't turn out to fit what the program needs out of them, I'd fault a coach who didn't make moves to part ways with them.

As for TJ, it seems to me like, first, he got injured and the staff underestimated it, second, things happened to make him feel like he was not appreciated, and third, some stuff we don't know about. I can't be too upset with anyone in that situation; it just sounds like it didn't turn out to be a good match for both parties.
 
I wasn't taking any stance on the "fault" debate. I just think it's funny when a guy goes from being a stud to a dud (from our fans' perspective) in about 1-2 months.
 
I wasn't taking any stance on the "fault" debate. I just think it's funny when a guy goes from being a stud to a dud (from our fans' perspective) in about 1-2 months.

Usually when some consider them "studs" its on how many stars they are rated... They get on campus and flame out... To me that makes them a "dud". Doesnt mean they are just as talented as when they walked in the door. They just couldnt hack it at OU
 
Everybody gets excited when a highly-touted recruit comes in (and rightfully so), then try to feel better through damage control by saying they didn't do much as they are leaving. I guess it's better than all Chicken Little-ing out and talking about how great they are and how we are screwed when they leave.

It's really hard to tell who lives up to the hype before they get here and who doesn't. The hype itself is overrated. Very few of the people who leave the team and transfer go on to be studs anywhere else. Maybe they really were overrated.
 
Back
Top