And yet somehow your premise that freshmen and sophomores won't improve year to year is a valid premise?
Did I say that? No, I didn't. My premise is that the bigest jump in improvement for a college player comes between the freshman and soph. year. After that it is incremental.
My second premise is that recruiting to a bad team is different from recruiting to a good team. For bad team recruiting, every recruit should be veiwed as a way to make the current team better. For good team recruiting, shaping,molding,laying ground work, and roster balancing is fine.
From all accounts, Kruger has three really good assistants. They make $200,000 per year. Giving that group 6 months to do it. And tasking them with scouring the nation and coming up with 3 guys that are better than any of that bunch from last year should be pretty simple. Remember, they lost to Chamanade. Got carried to overtime at home by by Eastern Popcorn State or someone. And among the other losses were 15 by double digits.
Coming in late and snagging Grooms,Arent, and M'buy was probably the best they could have hoped to do. And I sure hope those guys work out to some degree. But, our staff is a group of well paid pro's. And for at least this year they will be recruiting to a team that is probably not good enough. Whoever they sign, whether it be a freshman or JC, will need to be an imediate impact player.