Congrats to the women's team!

AdaSooner

Admin Emeritus
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
16,086
Reaction score
49
On a great start in conference play. This team has come a long way since the two games I watched early in the season. I said then, and believed I was right, that this OU team would be lucky to get an invitation to the NIT unless they improved substantially from the team I saw a few weeks ago. To be honest, I thought they were one of the worst group of players Sherri has put on the floor in years.

The team I watched dismantle OSU offensively and defensively is not the same group of players that triggered a hasty prediction that Sherri's guys would not make the post season this year. I'm happy to say I was wrong!
 
A lot of people were discourage three weeks ago. It is difficult to remember that Sherri often develops her teams throughout the year, and they tend to peak in March and April, with a couple of exceptions.

After some disappointments last year, we had a lot of seedlings that had to take root, and they had no example of how it was done. They figured it out. The result may be the strongest team since Courtney's freshman year which was probably the best that we have had since 2002, although it didn't make the Final Four. These seedlings don't know that there is a limit to how tall they can grow.
 
I like that we haven't had to play Baylor yet. Maybe when we expand the Big 12 Baylor can be in the other division. Or maybe we could contract the Big 12 and omit Baylor altogether ;)
 
I like that we haven't had to play Baylor yet. Maybe when we expand the Big 12 Baylor can be in the other division. Or maybe we could contract the Big 12 and omit Baylor altogether ;)

I LOVE your thinking!
 
I want to go where there is no Baylor or Texas.

We recruited Texas more effectively in the 80 years in which we were not in the same conference.
 
I want to go where there is no Baylor or Texas.

So should I just post the lyrics to Dixieland and replace all references to Dixie with "SEC?"

I wish I was in SEC, Hooray! Hooray!
In SEC I'll take my stand,
to live and die in SEC.


Gah now I feel like an A&M Aggie. I need a shower... or maybe I can ask Peyton Little how you can cleanse yourself of dirty Aggieness ;)
 
Actually, my first choice is the Pacific Twelve. Originally, I had hoped for the Big East or ACC until the Big East more or less folded. I would still go to:

1. Pacific Twelve
2. ACC
3. Big Ten

XXX. sec
 
There's little doubt that the Pac-12 would take OU, but it would have to be part of a package deal that included our southern arch rivals.
 
Sherri spoke against Pac-ing during the conference reallignment talks a few seasons ago; talking about long travel times to the west coast and how those games typically tipoff later than central/east games.

I'd really like to make this flyover regional thing work, even if it involves a 60-team big boy alliance that means that conferences lines get blurred and we suddenly play Arkansas or Notre Dame every year due to region.
 
I have never seen an economic advantage to the flyover states, and it is becoming all about economics. If we could have kept the Big Eight, I would like that. I didn't like the idea of accepting the southern "neighbors." I would go to any conference that didn't include Texas. But, I have no idea what the proposed superconferences will be.
 
I personally dislike the "superconference" trend we are in. I think the ideal size of a conference is somewhere around 8 or 10. It allows home-and-home round robins in most sports, and home and away schedules in football every two years.
 
I would join the League of Nations, the National Arab Emirates, or the Red-Headed League if it got us away from Texas.
 
I would join the League of Nations, the National Arab Emirates, or the Red-Headed League if it got us away from Texas.

Like it or not, the Horns and Sooners are joined at the waist, and there's nothing you or I can do to change that.
 
I think that what we are seeing is Sherri's concept of basketball. Although we had never heard of many of these players prior to their arrival at OU, Sherri was excited when she recruited them. Sometimes, it is frustrating to watch as her children go through their growing pains. I thought we would never see any value out of Gioya. Sherri kept saying how good she was. She just hadn't done it yet. We can say the same for Kay Kay.

Sherri has stood by proudly and watched as her projects developed. You could see the pride and feel the affection that she had for them. We didn't see results, but she stood by them.

Now that it is all coming together, what we are witnessing is Sherri's concept, her idea of what a team should be. This is what she wants a team to be like. It can shoot, run, and play vicious defense. In order for it to work, she has to have distribution. Distribution requires that something move.

Although Courtney was probably one of the five greatest players in women's basketball, it is Stacy Dale's jersey that is hanging from the rafters. She is the image on which Sherri wants to built the program. She was the distributor. Although we may recruit size for posts or guards who can kill from three, Sherri's first love is the distributors. Suddenly, we have several who can create and distribute. It puts the motion in OU's motion offense.

Gioya, Maddie, and Gabbi create a motion offense. More importantly, they create a motion defense, one that has holes in it that we can expose with our penetration. We were desperate in trying to get the ball to Courtney, leading to stolen passes. Yet, we find that we have at least fifteen wide open players per game under the basket with nobody guarding them. Kay Kay doesn't need to push anyone. She often finds herself wide open. Just catch the pass.

I don't know that I have ever seen Sherri show such pride in a team. She is elated by what is going on right now. It is what she wants in a team, and it will be here another three or four years because they are freshmen and sophomores. She has more of the same, only maybe better, on the way. This could get exciting.

If you were a recruit and had seen OU against Texas, TCU, or OSU, would you not want to be at OU where all of this is brewing?
 
If you were a recruit and had seen OU against Texas, TCU, or OSU, would you not want to be at OU where all of this is brewing?
No, I'd much rather be sitting on the bench four years at UConn. I might never play more than a few minutes at the end of blowouts, but they let me cut down a piece of the net when their future WNBA All-Stars win championships!

:rolleyes:
 
I think that badger is being just a bit sarcastic in that post, but I also don't understand the player magnet that is UConn. Geno's a terrific coach, but he can be a bit much at times. I liked Pat Summit way more. Geno never had to drive the team bus, and he let his players chase off one of the most gifted players he's ever recruited. They also stretch the recruiting rules to the absolute limit at UConn, and the NCAA lets them get away with it.


BTW, in the current RPI at RPIratings, OU is 23rd, with the second best SOS of any team in the top 50 of the RPI. According to my observation of other teams ahead of OU, I think that the Sooners will easily be in the top 20 - and maybe the top 15 - of the RPI with two more wins in the next two games.
 
Ya know syb, this is the team I've been dreaming of seeing for many years while Sherri's players just couldn't or wouldn't get on board with the concept. This is a team that may challenge for the NC this year or soon. They simply "get it".
 
Actually, my first choice is the Pacific Twelve. Originally, I had hoped for the Big East or ACC until the Big East more or less folded. I would still go to:

1. Pacific Twelve
2. ACC
3. Big Ten

XXX. sec

The big 10 would not be a bad gig for OU.
 
I'mstill puzzeled by last years team. Sherri spoke of them as she has spoken about this years team early on in the season. I have a feeling (no evidence whatsoever)of what(who) was the problem, but am so grateful that it clearly hasnt carried over. It left with graduation. I see no possibility that such will recur this year. This group will just get better.
 
I think that badger is being just a bit sarcastic in that post
Or snarky. I also am amazed at how top players choose the UConn bench over four-year starter elsewhere. I wonder if other schools wonder the same thing about football recruits that choose us ;)

I get wanting to play for a contender, but if you can contend AND start for the contender immediately? Put me in coach I'm ready to play today
 
Back
Top