I don't know that we know enough about Derica or NIcole to have much of an idea yet, and I'm not sure that they compare to each other. Which was better, DRob or Courtney? It kind of depends on what you need.
Derica looks to me to be the most D-1 ready of any of our freshmen, although it didn't look that way initially. She doesn't look like she is quick enough or moves well enough. Yet, she seems to be where things happen. She does get some rebounds, tips others, passes well, and rarely loses the ball. We haven't seen her against a good opponent yet. Sherri keeps wanting her to shoot. In the second half, they were covering her like she was Vegas. It opened up some people, and she made the right passes. They just couldn't make the shots. I will be interested to see if she can do it against UCLA.
Nicole came in with a reputation. It surprises me what type of player she is. She has a lot more athletic ability than I had anticipated, but she isn't as pure of a shooter as I had heard. She has a nice shot. It just isn't falling. Yet, when I see her overall game, I want her to stay on the floor. She does things that others aren't doing, like block out. She hustles. She tries. I think she appears to be losing a little confidence, but she just needs to relax and let it flow. She is doing it right. She seems to need more time to get ready for D-1 ball, but can only get it by playing. She just isn't what I expected, although I must admit that I like what I see. I just hope the shots start falling.
Derica and Nicole are so different that I don't think of them as an either/or situation. You may well need both. If Derica can play D-1 ball, any team would want her shot. She would open up everyone else with her propensity to hit threes. She is a free throw expert as I had heard. So, she misses her first FT?