You have an interesting propensity to irritate your allies.
OK. So you have Survey USA, or do you. You should learn about polling and polls if you want to cite them. Survey USA is right about as often as a broken clock and with about the same significance. Due to the cost, they quit using call centers and live callers. They use robocalls exclusively. Now, does that mean anything to you? They also are using a call list of voters who voted in the 2014 election. Any problem there?
Quinnipiac, at one time reputable, has begun to use call lists like the 2014 list which tends to skew their results by about two to four percent. Rasmussen did the same thing. But, I think they sold out to FOX or somehow became FOX news. It creates a few polls that are cheap, but that tend to be based on invalid information. The use of robocalls is a real problem.
Even in 2012 and 2014, there were poll-averaging assemblages that didn't use Rasmussen and Survey USA. I suspect that Quinnipiac may make the list. I don't know why they use old lists when they are not so limited by funding. The Survey USA poll may well have been commissioned by Trump.
It is a bit too early for the legitimate pollsters to be at work. They cost too much to do weekly. The last time I saw a PEW, CNN, ABC, or Washington Post poll, Hillary had about a nine-point lead over the nearest Republican. That may have declined a bit, but probably by no more than three or four points. You have to examine real polls to avoid Meghan Kelly's "numbers that make you feel better as a Republican."" I don't think she is voting for the Donald.
