Good Luck tonight Pokes

[jmizzy4ou]

LOL at this poster acting like there's some drastic difference between OU and Ok. State's program...

Furthermore, I love how you're acting like two losing seasons ultimately fails when measuring the overall success of a program. Seriously?

Ok. State fans might disagree, but I would be perfectly fine taking OU's stature and accolades from 1988 (since you arbitrarily used that as your reference point) until now compared to Oklahoma State's. A National Title appearance, another Final Four, conference championships, and a plethora of wins compared to most NCAA programs gives my argument a leg to stand on. In fact, since OU holds such a decisive advantage in the overall head-to-head series, I'd be willing to bet that they hold the series advantage since your chosen year of 1988, too.

Although I will take OU's success since your reference point of 1988 (and overall program success as well), I will concede that Ok. State has had a better two-year run. Congrats on only having a 5-4 series advantage during OU's worse two-year stretch in over 30 years. You can now go back to beating your chest over Ok. State's valiant and courageous NIT effort.

:woot:woot:woot

Pretty much ended the debate here. The rest will just be aggie arguments......

 

[stoops4pres]

I guess as long as you beat OSU, losing seasons are OK. We're your "bowl" game.

Might I suggest putting the alcohol down the next time you decide to post on here?

Just a suggestion.

 

[stoops4pres]

:woot:woot:woot

Pretty much ended the debate here. The rest will just be aggie arguments......

Some aggies crack me up.

 

[jerry]

Yeah - don't let these facts get in the way of your lame smack talk, skyvue.

Glad they lost.