You are obviously a fan of Aston's, and she has more than one on this board. You are also a fan of recruiting. OK. The argument is that Sherri has had several down years recruiting while Texas has had several good years recruiting. According to that argument, Aston's young people should beat OU's young people. We just had a game in which the Longhorns had a bit more experience, and the best players they put on the floor were juniors and seniors. The best players for OU tended to be freshmen and sophomores. Yet, OU won with the lesser recruited personnel. Did inferior talent win? Was Aston outcoached? Maybe, it is possible that the recruits aren't quite what has been made of them, at least not yet.
Aston is, indeed, older than Sherri. Sherri has been to the NCAA tournament for 15 straight years. Aston has been twice. Indeed, Sherri has been to nine Sweet Sixteens and three Final Fours. In order to equal that, Aston will have to be coaching at the age of 65.
Aston may be a good coach. Who she worked under is of little interest, unless you want to compare her to Bo Overton. He worked under a Hall of Fame coach. Sherri didn't.
Actually, Texas has one of the best records against OU since Sherri came, 20-22. Texas won 9 of the first 11. I'm not sure what this demonstrates. I'm not all that sure you can compare.
The point is that Aston has not yet delivered. Strangely, she just had the opportunity, and we are young with lesser recruited names. I have seen so many names come through Texas that just didn't measure up to their hype that I tend to wait for them to show what they can do. Of the players on teh floor last night, if you were to select five players for a team, what player would you want other than Enempkali? The next five or six performers were those unknowns that had found a place on the OU team. Curiously, I don't think Enempkali was a big name recruit.
If Aston is good, she'll earn her place and the recognition that goes with it. It is a bit premature to assign any measure of success because she is a great recruiter until we see how those recruits perform. A Sweet Sixteen or Elite Eight might be nice. But, based on what we saw, OU is just as good without any big name recruits.