Soonercuda
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 3,466
- Reaction score
- 670
I would assume we will do something very close to this
Our women's basketball team is very good and has been for Coach Barancyzk's entire time in Norman.5% to women’s basketball is too much. We should give 5% to softball and 1% to women’s bball.
How can the law stop a person from paying more than the Deloitte-determined FMV? It isn't breaking a law, and telling people what they can and can't do with their money is a slippery slope.The above is revenue sharing...you can still do NIL deals with players. But the difference is supposed to be that the NIL deals are to be at Fair Market Value for value provided by the player endorsement....determined by a third party (Deloitte). It will be very interesting to see what happens the first time Deloitte says a NIL deal is over FMV.
There is also talk about grandfathering the deals already signed prior to the Settlement....so still lots of details to be worked out.
5% to women’s basketball is too much. We should give 5% to softball and 1% to women’s bball.
and they will continue to do so ..We already spent more than that on NIL for football. Georgia does too.
there will be a lawsuit that the schools will lose and NIL will stay just like it is currently .. the wild west ..The above is revenue sharing...you can still do NIL deals with players. But the difference is supposed to be that the NIL deals are to be at Fair Market Value for value provided by the player endorsement....determined by a third party (Deloitte). It will be very interesting to see what happens the first time Deloitte says a NIL deal is over FMV.
There is also talk about grandfathering the deals already signed prior to the Settlement....so still lots of details to be worked out.
My attorney fees are regulated (attys cant get more than 50% of a contingency fee no matter what).. why can't these golden calf players have regulations?How can the law stop a person from paying more than the Deloitte-determined FMV? It isn't breaking a law, and telling people what they can and can't do with their money is a slippery slope.
Because those have been bargained for. By some governing body. The players have no governing body bargaining for them.My attorney fees are regulated (attys cant get more than 50% of a contingency fee no matter what).. why can't these golden calf players have regulations?
you are an employee ...My attorney fees are regulated (attys cant get more than 50% of a contingency fee no matter what).. why can't these golden calf players have regulations?
It becomes an amateur athlete issue. Olympics has a committee that regulates how much endorsements and what type classify as pro versus amateurs for the individual sports. That is why some Olympic athletes have day jobs.How can the law stop a person from paying more than the Deloitte-determined FMV? It isn't breaking a law, and telling people what they can and can't do with their money is a slippery slope.
Certainly not an employee of the bar associationyou are an employee ...
all of the relevant orgs NCAA / conferences / schools continue to claim that these are NOT employees .
The firm you work for has to abide by that law. You are an employee of the firm. These athletes are, again, not employees. It's just like the NFL. Dak may make $60 million a year in salary, but there is legally no cap to what any company wants to pay him.Certainly not an employee of the bar association
The firm you work for has to abide by that law. You are an employee of the firm. These athletes are, again, not employees. It's just like the NFL. Dak may make $60 million a year in salary, but there is legally no cap to what any company wants to pay him.
that is not remotely the same thing and now the olympics doesn't have the requirement any longer ..It becomes an amateur athlete issue. Olympics has a committee that regulates how much endorsements and what type classify as pro versus amateurs for the individual sports. That is why some Olympic athletes have day jobs.
Colleges or NCAA can set a FMV standard and if a certain deviation above then they are no longer amateur.
Not saying I agree this is best option, but it is an option.
Many Olympic sports still have endorsement limit requirements. Mostly smaller sports but they are limited what country and endorsements they can get to compete. It’s very similar. The original judge in bannon ruling used Olympic standard as part of argument on why other amateur athletes should get nil.that is not remotely the same thing and now the olympics doesn't have the requirement any longer ..