House Settlement Revenue Sharing

We already spent more than that on NIL for football. Georgia does too.
 
The above is revenue sharing...you can still do NIL deals with players. But the difference is supposed to be that the NIL deals are to be at Fair Market Value for value provided by the player endorsement....determined by a third party (Deloitte). It will be very interesting to see what happens the first time Deloitte says a NIL deal is over FMV.

There is also talk about grandfathering the deals already signed prior to the Settlement....so still lots of details to be worked out.
 
The above is revenue sharing...you can still do NIL deals with players. But the difference is supposed to be that the NIL deals are to be at Fair Market Value for value provided by the player endorsement....determined by a third party (Deloitte). It will be very interesting to see what happens the first time Deloitte says a NIL deal is over FMV.

There is also talk about grandfathering the deals already signed prior to the Settlement....so still lots of details to be worked out.
How can the law stop a person from paying more than the Deloitte-determined FMV? It isn't breaking a law, and telling people what they can and can't do with their money is a slippery slope.
 
They will never come up with a system that works. Too many people with diverse and competing interest wanting to get rich. I say lets go to intramurals, or something like they have in the Ivy league. Separate school from sports all together. I'm done with it. Gave up pro sports a long time ago, and I am ready to give up on college sports.
 
The above is revenue sharing...you can still do NIL deals with players. But the difference is supposed to be that the NIL deals are to be at Fair Market Value for value provided by the player endorsement....determined by a third party (Deloitte). It will be very interesting to see what happens the first time Deloitte says a NIL deal is over FMV.

There is also talk about grandfathering the deals already signed prior to the Settlement....so still lots of details to be worked out.
there will be a lawsuit that the schools will lose and NIL will stay just like it is currently .. the wild west ..
 
How can the law stop a person from paying more than the Deloitte-determined FMV? It isn't breaking a law, and telling people what they can and can't do with their money is a slippery slope.
My attorney fees are regulated (attys cant get more than 50% of a contingency fee no matter what).. why can't these golden calf players have regulations?
 
My attorney fees are regulated (attys cant get more than 50% of a contingency fee no matter what).. why can't these golden calf players have regulations?
Because those have been bargained for. By some governing body. The players have no governing body bargaining for them.
 
How can the law stop a person from paying more than the Deloitte-determined FMV? It isn't breaking a law, and telling people what they can and can't do with their money is a slippery slope.
It becomes an amateur athlete issue. Olympics has a committee that regulates how much endorsements and what type classify as pro versus amateurs for the individual sports. That is why some Olympic athletes have day jobs.

Colleges or NCAA can set a FMV standard and if a certain deviation above then they are no longer amateur.

Not saying I agree this is best option, but it is an option.
 
Certainly not an employee of the bar association
The firm you work for has to abide by that law. You are an employee of the firm. These athletes are, again, not employees. It's just like the NFL. Dak may make $60 million a year in salary, but there is legally no cap to what any company wants to pay him.
 
The firm you work for has to abide by that law. You are an employee of the firm. These athletes are, again, not employees. It's just like the NFL. Dak may make $60 million a year in salary, but there is legally no cap to what any company wants to pay him.

The Olympics regulates endorsements allowed to amateur athletes as I mentioned above. So appears to be a legal option.

Standards can apply without laws. In my field if I violate standards set by an industry organization, I will be unhirable. But that is not a law or requirement.
 
It becomes an amateur athlete issue. Olympics has a committee that regulates how much endorsements and what type classify as pro versus amateurs for the individual sports. That is why some Olympic athletes have day jobs.

Colleges or NCAA can set a FMV standard and if a certain deviation above then they are no longer amateur.

Not saying I agree this is best option, but it is an option.
that is not remotely the same thing and now the olympics doesn't have the requirement any longer ..
 
that is not remotely the same thing and now the olympics doesn't have the requirement any longer ..
Many Olympic sports still have endorsement limit requirements. Mostly smaller sports but they are limited what country and endorsements they can get to compete. It’s very similar. The original judge in bannon ruling used Olympic standard as part of argument on why other amateur athletes should get nil.
 
Back
Top