atlantasooner
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2008
- Messages
- 1,599
- Reaction score
- 11
I disagree. Kids are smarter than you think. They don't just come to OU because the assistant coach is young, likes rap music and dresses hip.
Kids want to be coached by experienced, knowledgeable adults most the time. So what you are saying is go get a high-risk high reward early 20's gal?
Due to the bolded comment, Ill take the opposite of what you say 9-9x...
What I'm saying is that talent acquisition is the number one program problem.
Signing top 20 kids consistently is the only way to get to the newly stated goal by
Sherri on Twitter today.
Washington was signing talent early in her coaching tenure at Penn State then the talent dropped off. Look she's a very experienced assistant with a great resume.
But dig up one quote from Muffet McGraw for me where McGraw says
Washington was our best recruiter/closer, I'll withdraw my statement.
Stiles other than her own LOI has never signed a top 20 player. And more worrisome she's not been actively recruiting top 20 kids. Now she has been heavily involved in talent evaluations of lower ranked kids doing more with less. So that's a huge positive. Can she become a great recruiter at the level OU needs. Entirely possible. But she's going to have to develop that skill set.
Recruiting is a marathon not a sprint. Recruiting a top hoops player means you are involved with them over a 3 to 4 year time period.
I was looking for someone from a program that is routinely signing those kids. That coach already would have built up relationships with the kids OU needs to sign. Or a current WNBA star looking to get into coaching whose name appeal jump starts those relationships. Someone with some gravitas/star/instant cred/appeal.
And for all of your name calling you or euphguy have not once addressed my primary point.
Recruiting, Recruiting, Recruiting in any meaningful manner.
Last edited: