MBB Transfer Portal Thread: Moser Year 4

Boulder, here is what is currently in the works. As I've noted many times, your $500k per player amount is way too high.

www.espn.com

Sources: NCAA in talks to settle NIL antitrust case

The leaders of college sports are involved in "deep discussions" to reach a legal settlement that would likely lay out the framework for sharing revenue with athletes in a future NCAA business model, sources told ESPN.
www.espn.com www.espn.com
 
WTSooner said:
Boulder, here is what is currently in the works. As I've noted many times, your $500k per player amount is way too high.

www.espn.com

Sources: NCAA in talks to settle NIL antitrust case

The leaders of college sports are involved in "deep discussions" to reach a legal settlement that would likely lay out the framework for sharing revenue with athletes in a future NCAA business model, sources told ESPN.
www.espn.com www.espn.com
Click to expand...
The 500k per player has nothing to do with this.


That range is the long term cba with a player union. Rev share number (ballpark)
 
BoulderSooner said:
The 500k per player has nothing to do with this.


That range is the long term cba with a player union. Rev share number (ballpark)
Click to expand...
This would be in place instead of that. And if they do this shortly, they aren't going to hop to full-scale CBA anytime soon I wouldn't think. But I still think you can use this as a guide. The revenue shared just isn't going to be high enough where basketball players are getting $500k across the board. It's just not.
 
WTSooner said:
This would be in place instead of that. And if they do this shortly, they aren't going to hop to full-scale CBA anytime soon I wouldn't think. But I still think you can use this as a guide. The revenue shared just isn't going to be high enough where basketball players are getting $500k across the board. It's just not.
Click to expand...
Basketball revenue is over 12 mil at OU. 40 percent of that /13 is almost 400k per player. And 40 percent player share is on the low side of revenue. Most pro leagues (and that is what this will be are closer to 50% player share.)

That is over 460k per player
 
skyvue said:
Looks as though Godwin is the man to blame currently (it's always someone).

He and Moore are the two known quantities on the team. If we can get a better center, great, but for now my primary concern is virtually every other position on the team and two or three spots on the bench.
Click to expand...
No one is blaming Sam for a thing. We are blaming our head coach for roster construction.
 
allday92 said:
Are you sure we've downgraded our athletic ability? Moore is still there, Cooper will play. Jones is a pretty vertical athlete and Elvis is athletic in a way nobody was last year - he's shifty and has a stop and go game. I agree overall, we may be a little less athletic, but still athletic enough to compete at the high P5 level. The shooting has improved, but now is there enough playmaking and verticality from the 5 position? Those are the two main needs to fill now. If you land Garrison or Onyenso, then you can afford to be a little less athletic everywhere else.
Click to expand...
Losing Waldo and Oweh is a big hit athletically. I don’t think any of the guys we’re bringing in are close to their level. I agree about Cooper but I also have no idea if Moser will actually play him.
 
Last edited:
Trying to dig on JIC.

Obviously, we've heard from the OU side that OU's kicking the tires.

But it sounds like Kentucky and/or Ole Miss are as well, or could. Supposedly, Ole Miss conducted an in-home. I'm not sure where that info originated though. I gave up both Rivals and/or 247 subs about 4-5 days ago. StoopsBros = anti-media. On my own island, lol. I would guess the Ole Miss rivals site. Grain of salt.

Edit: Ole Miss did an in-home before JIC committing to VA Tech. Still, it sounds like there could be renewed interest.

What a timeline. Damn.

1714442512857.png
 
Last edited:
TSSR said:
Godwin is a liability vs any athletic team with size. Godwin did the majority of his work vs smaller teams in the noncon. Thinking Center isn't a problem is strange to me.
Click to expand...
He was good in spots. Houston I believe was one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top