That may be your opinion, but my expectations aren't to limp into the tournament with 9 and 10 seeds. And that is what he has done 3 of the 6 years he has made the tournament. He also had a 5 seed lose to a team from the Summit Conference, and then the two good years with Buddy.
Neither Kelvin nor Billy had anything resembling 9/10 seeds this far in to their tenures at OU.
So after 8 years:
Kelvin had 8 tourney appearances, 5 1st round losses, 4 double digit seeds, 2 losses as a 4 seed, 1 sweet 16 and 1 Final Four. He took over a team that had been to the NIT 3 of the prior 4 years, but had Ryan Minor as a Junior. We made the Final Four in year 8.
Lon has 6 tourney appearances, 3 1st round losses, 2 double digit seeds, 1 loss as a 5 seed, 1 Sweet 16, and 1 Final Four(with this year pending). He took over a team that was on probation and coming off 2 losing seasons in a row. We were in the Final Four in year 5.
Clearly we were in worse shape when Lon took over. He built up the success much quicker. He has struggled to find sustained success off the Final Four.
Year 8 and 9 were the pinnacle for Kelvin. He too struggled to find sustained success after the Final Four. We went to the Elite 8 the next year and then missed the tournament. We lost in the 2nd round as 3 seed and we lost in the 1st round as a 6 seed in his last two years in Norman. He left with us headed to probation.
At the conclusion of his 12 year run, Kelvin had:
11 tourney appearances
6 1st round losses and a second round loss as a 3 seed
1 Sweet Sixteen
1 Elite 8
1 Final Four
There are a lot of similarities between Kelvin and Lon. Each had tremendous all-time great players come from being unheralded recruits to being National Player of the Year caliber who led us to the Final Four and elite success. Then the recruiting classes with really good players who played a role on those teams struggled when they became the leaders. Many transferred, etc.
With the small exception of the 8 year period in the 80s with Tubbs at the helm, this is OU basketball. It is a very good program. I would guess a Top 20-25 program nationally with no empirical data to back that up. But we are not UNC, Duke, or Kansas.
And to the poster using Freeman and Polla as evidence of bad recruiting, remember that all coaches have them. Kelvin had Oleg, Alex Spaulding, Michael Cotton, Blake Johnston, and many others. It happens.
We have the 15th ranked recruiting class with the #36 player and 3 Top 125 per Rivals. Let's see what the next 2-3 years holds and reassess.