thebigabd
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 13,496
- Reaction score
- 77
It is shocking that you would say that a juco player going to Tech is better than a juco going to OU. Shocking.
I have no idea if Nash is going to be good for them... I assume that BCG has been watching him for awhile, and he may have been the best SF prospect they could get at this point in the game.
But the proof is in the pudding for Goff. The guy is like 25 years old and is an average junior college player. Why can't you see that? Why should we expect him to be any good at this level? I know everyone wants him to be, but what evidence do you have to suggest that he is going to be good? he cant score, he doesnt seem to rebound very well, etc.
I do know that Tech is more put together than OU for next season, and will probably be the better coached team which hasnt been the case for Tech in the past.