The funny thing about this thread is that no one is questioning whether Smart is a good player. He's a very good player. He's still the floppingest fish in the big 12.
And he's still the Big 12 POY.
The funny thing about this thread is that no one is questioning whether Smart is a good player. He's a very good player. He's still the floppingest fish in the big 12.
Oh, 19, my bad. So Kruger or his players left zero legacy at the 3 schools he's coached at since then while he was getting bounced in the first and 2nd round 7 out of 8 times (1 Sweet 16) while he added to his overall losing NCAA record. I'm just trying to get all this straight. I figured he would have left a legacy at some point since Forrest Gump was released since I do think he's a good coach but since Elite 8s are apparently the measuring stick I've been wrong and he's been worthless for two decades.
Well, firstly, it would be alot more fun if you OSU guys could keep from drifting off track with your arguements. The point is that, if a one and done comes through any program and the team doesn't do any better than 3rd in conference play and can not win any more than a couple of games in the tourney, then that player didn't leave any great mark on the program.
A four year player from any program could leave a body of work that would and could be considered a significant impact on the program. The standard has to be higher for the one and dones. The expectation is higher. If you cann't win big with them, they are not worth having.
Smart is a good player and Kruger is a good coach. Smart is a flopper and Kruger's 5 seniors will graduate on time.
That "flopper" is the best player in the conferece, quit being jealous and just enjoy that sweet 11 seed. Too bad Ford can't kill it in recruiting like Kruger with all those 3 stars and JUCOs. You guys are losing Rivals 100 4 stars and bringing in 3 players with no legit offer sheets. The goal is to win games. I'd take 1 Smart over 500 Tyler Neals that waste a valuable scholarship while doing nothing but cutting farts on the bench during games for 4 years on his way to a degree.
Smart has done something that only 2 other players have done in Big 12 history. He is also 1 of only 4 Big 12 POY winners from OSU. He has done it the right way on and off the court. He will be loved and remember for years to come by OSU fans. His legacy will be just fine no matter what happens in the tournament.
Well, firstly, it would be alot more fun if you OSU guys could keep from drifting off track with your arguements. The point is that, if a one and done comes through any program and the team doesn't do any better than 3rd in conference play and can not win any more than a couple of games in the tourney, then that player didn't leave any great mark on the program.
A four year player from any program could leave a body of work that would and could be considered a significant impact on the program. The standard has to be higher for the one and dones. The expectation is higher. If you cann't win big with them, they are not worth having.
Smart is a good player and Kruger is a good coach. Smart is a flopper and Kruger's 5 seniors will graduate on time.
Well, firstly, it would be alot more fun if you OSU guys could keep from drifting off track with your arguements. The point is that, if a one and done comes through any program and the team doesn't do any better than 3rd in conference play and can not win any more than a couple of games in the tourney, then that player didn't leave any great mark on the program.
A four year player from any program could leave a body of work that would and could be considered a significant impact on the program. The standard has to be higher for the one and dones. The expectation is higher. If you cann't win big with them, they are not worth having.
Smart is a good player and Kruger is a good coach. Smart is a flopper and Kruger's 5 seniors will graduate on time.
Smart has done something that only 2 other players have done in Big 12 history. He is also 1 of only 4 Big 12 POY winners from OSU. He has done it the right way on and off the court. He will be loved and remember for years to come by OSU fans. His legacy will be just fine no matter what happens in the tournament.
We had Blake Griffin for 2 years...They have Smart for one. Doesn't matter if we went out in the first round with Griffin or the Elite 8...We would take 2 or even 1 year with Blake then 4 years of Buddy Hield.
A Griffin, Beasley, Durant, Smart, McLemore...you take these players b/c even though you may not win it all, one year with them gives you a better shot than 4 years with Hield. B/c if Hield ever became as talented as these guys, he wouldn't be here 4 years.
Smart is the most competitive player I have ever seen at OSU. Travis Ford said it best when he said "Smart is involved in every play on the floor good or bad". He would sweep the floors and lead the dance routine at halftime if it helped win games. I'm glad he flops, because the officials are calling it and it helps win games. When it stops working I bet he stops doing it.
Another Aggie that doesn't get the point. The consensus is that Smart is a talented player. The question is why does such a talented player feel the need to use such an angle shooting gimmick to gain an edge. And the answer is that people that use angle shooting gimmicks to gain an advantage are dimminishing the accomplishment that they acheive.
That is what I am saying. Those gimmicks are working and he is giving his team an advantage. The offinisive foul against Rodriguez was a turning point it helped OSU win the game.
I know that is what you are saying. And what I'm saying is that using an angle shooting gimmick to gain a competitive edge is sleezy, 2nd rate, and classless.
It is rare that the talented resort to that. It is usually the ordinary that grasp for those type of edges. That is why it is noteworthy in this case.
You are certainly welcome to your opinion. There is now and always will be more than one right way to do anything.
But, it is not a free roll bringing in a one and done type. Nothing is free and it comes with a cost. You risk team chemistry. There is a risk of setting the program back when they leave. Ask Rick Barnes how that works. Or mayby even ask Capel about the aftermat of Warren, Mason-Griffin, and Gallon.
Not every Coach can pull it off and not every coach wants to try. And you don't have to do it that way to put a really good team on the floor. Senior 3 stars beat freshman 5 stars all the time.
You. Cannot. Be. Serious.
Has your hatred for OSU made you delusional?
So attempting to draw fouls on shots when you're driving in the lane is "sleezy, 2nd rate and classess"?
Really?
:facepalm
So your saying would take Hield over Griffin?????
in a heartbeat.