Transfer Portal 2027

[daqman]

Michigan taking 5 HS kids and an overseas hs aged kid

2 5 stars. (No brainer)
2 4 stars
1 3 star

ok.
does that mean we can/should sign a bunch of freshmen because michigan does?
we're not michigan.
i said "sign freshmen that are really good". mich got a top 25 player. check
also said "sigh freshmen that are cheap. mich likely has a lot more nil to throw around and maybe they have coaches who actually develop and retain freshmen.

 

[Topher]

 

[austing7]

He's tall! He has that going for him.

Would definitely be a take imo. You can’t teach size!

 

[Stikboy]

Would definitely be a take imo. You can’t teach size!

TWSS


OK Porter and Denny, here we go! If i'm understanding correctly Denny is upping the resources for Porter so he can get what he needs now? Just want to be clear.

 

[The_Banker]

Would definitely be a take imo. You can’t teach size!

lol no

 

[TINY]

TWSS


OK Porter and Denny, here we go! If i'm understanding correctly Denny is upping the resources for Porter so he can get what he needs now? Just want to be clear.

Do we think Denny is going to do the proper thing and use tv revenue to pay NIL? Joe C and previous admin were too scared of the toothless ncaa to try that but it really is the only way to make up the differences between OU and the biggest spenders.

 

[cmdsooner]

 

[WTSooner]

Do we think Denny is going to do the proper thing and use tv revenue to pay NIL? Joe C and previous admin were too scared of the toothless ncaa to try that but it really is the only way to make up the differences between OU and the biggest spenders.

What?

"College sports revenue sharing is regulated, primarily through a landmark 2025 settlement of the House v. NCAA case, setting a $20.5 million cap for DI schools in 2025–26, projected to rise annually. This system, managed by the new College Sports Commission (CSC), allows schools to directly pay athletes up to 22% of average athletic revenue."

 

[TINY]

What?

"College sports revenue sharing is regulated, primarily through a landmark 2025 settlement of the House v. NCAA case, setting a $20.5 million cap for DI schools in 2025–26, projected to rise annually. This system, managed by the new College Sports Commission (CSC), allows schools to directly pay athletes up to 22% of average athletic revenue."

My understanding is that many schools are not adhering to that cap at all. Their state laws allow for them to pay players directly and that’s what they are doing, without capping it.

 

[WTSooner]

My understanding is that many schools are not adhering to that cap at all. Their state laws allow for them to pay players directly and that’s what they are doing, without capping it.

First I've heard of that.

 

[Topher]

 

[Topher]

 

[austing7]

Two years of eligibility, 6-8, and shot around 39% from three.

 

[cmdsooner]

Member this guy? I member.

 

[BoulderSooner]

My understanding is that many schools are not adhering to that cap at all. Their state laws allow for them to pay players directly and that’s what they are doing, without capping it.

First I've heard of that.

they are not using tv money ..

what schools are doing is having their MMRH (multi media rights holder) in OU's case Learfield sign players to NIL deals ..

meaning if learfield owes OU 20 mil a year .. instead pay OU 10 and buy players NIL rights with the other 10 (dollar figures made up) ..

 

[BoulderSooner]

What?

"College sports revenue sharing is regulated, primarily through a landmark 2025 settlement of the House v. NCAA case, setting a $20.5 million cap for DI schools in 2025–26, projected to rise annually. This system, managed by the new College Sports Commission (CSC), allows schools to directly pay athletes up to 22% of average athletic revenue."

there is also no current enforcement rules for any of this ..