Updated ranking from Prospects Nation

[SoonerNorm]

http://prospectsnation.com/players/ranked/2017

 

[SOONERGRAD]

Good to see some Oklahoma girls still in top 100.

Llanusa #28
Johnson #52

 

[sybarite]

It seems to me that they both started out a lot higher. OU is talking seriously to at least four of the remaining 100. I wonder if they will remain ranked that highly if they commit to OU?

 

[soonerstar]

I do not believe that a player drops in the rankings just because she commits to OU. Sounds like conspiracy theorists.

 

[SoonerNorm]

I do not believe that a player drops in the rankings just because she commits to OU. Sounds like conspiracy theorists.

+1. I haven't seen any evidence recruiting services give a rip who kids sign with.

 

[Sweetest OU Girl]

I do not believe that a player drops in the rankings just because she commits to OU. Sounds like conspiracy theorists.

It appears you have quite a bit to learn about the recruiting services and who they get information from.

 

[soonerstar]

It appears you have quite a bit to learn about the recruiting services and who they get information from.

If you know so much, teach me. I am also not one that thinks certain referees have it in for OU like some on here do. That does not mean that I do not hate to see some officials calling our game. I do. It is because I consider them to be poor officials, not biased against OU.

 

[Mac]

I can't see kids drooping for signing with OU, but most of the kids who pick Stanford seem to move up...

 

[SoonerNorm]

Kids start getting evaluated at early ages. I strongly suspect that part of the evaluation is based on projecting how much improvement is expected in future years. Some kids will develop more than was projected and some less. That is not an exact science.

 

[skilledserv]

It seems to me that they both started out a lot higher. OU is talking seriously to at least four of the remaining 100. I wonder if they will remain ranked that highly if they commit to OU?

Old saying here in Texas is........ It's not what you do, but who you do it against. What effected both Dungee and Johnson was when they got on the EYBL circuit. As far as Ana it was more of what SoonerNorm said, she was ranked number 2 as an 8th grader. When ranking them so early it's more of what they are projected to become. Some kids develop later than others and sometimes evaluators haven't seen everyone.

 

[Sweetest OU Girl]

Old saying here in Texas is........ It's not what you do, but who you do it against. What effected both Dungee and Johnson was when they got on the EYBL circuit. As far as Ana it was more of what SoonerNorm said, she was ranked number 2 as an 8th grader. When ranking them so early it's more of what they are projected to become. Some kids develop later than others and sometimes evaluators haven't seen everyone.

We'll see SS. You keep suggesting neither should even get a scholarship at the NAIA level. Only Texas girls - and only those signed by your favorite teams are even college quality.

We'll see, SS.

Had to laugh at the bolded statement. It should be stated as: Sometimes evaluators have an agenda - or is that almost all the time?

 

[Soonerfan3205]

Old saying here in Texas is........ It's not what you do, but who you do it against. What effected both Dungee and Johnson was when they got on the EYBL circuit. As far as Ana it was more of what SoonerNorm said, she was ranked number 2 as an 8th grader. When ranking them so early it's more of what they are projected to become. Some kids develop later than others and sometimes evaluators haven't seen everyone.

Just an FYI- Ana was impacted due to an injury. Missed a lot of EYBL and AAU due to the injury and played in two tourneys she really should not have played in with the injury. She is 100% again now. Hopefully, she will remain healthy throughout this years EYBL/AAU season.

 

[skilledserv]

We'll see SS. You keep suggesting neither should even get a scholarship at the NAIA level. Only Texas girls - and only those signed by your favorite teams are even college quality.

We'll see, SS.

Had to laugh at the bolded statement. It should be stated as: Sometimes evaluators have an agenda - or is that almost all the time?

Never said that but I understand you get caught up with just OU stuff

 

[sybarite]

Never said that but I understand you get caught up with just OU stuff

We tend to like OU on an OU board (well, except for certain people).