Cade davis

So you admit you were wrong again. It takes a big poster to do so, I commend you.

What was I wrong about? I never said Evans started more than Humphrey because I knew Humphrey started every game, or almost every game, his true frosh year, but it was out of necessity because of Evans injury.

Again, quit using stats to justify your opinion. Go back and watch the games, like I did. I was there.
 
Are you this dumb? You're just playing, right? That's why I tend to have a rule to never argue with people who use your instead of you're. For some reason, the light bulb just never turned on for guys that do that. If you didn't listen to YOUR second grade teacher, YOU'RE not going to listen to any other adult.

Avoidance
 
You said as a true frosh, he started a number of games. More than any other true frosh big in the Kelvin era, save Bookout. That should tell you something about his potential. In fact, he started as much as a true frosh as Najera did as a redshirt frosh.

I would suggest you are the one that can't keep up. Maybe you should stop studying stats and watch the games. :ez-laugh

you are simply intellectually dishonest.
 
Last edited:
You said as a true frosh, he started a number of games. More than any other true frosh big in the Kelvin era, save Bookout. That should tell you something about his potential. In fact, he started as much as a true frosh as Najera did as a redshirt frosh.

I would suggest you are the one that can't keep up. Maybe you should stop studying stats and watch the games. :ez-laugh

you are simply intellectually dishonest.

Well...I guess I did state that. I thought I erased that sentence, but oh well.

Humphrey still wasn't skilled offensively, not even close to Evans game. Again, notice Evans only played in 2 games that year. Had he been healthy, Humphrey is a role player who starts a few games here and there.
 
Well...I guess I did state that. I thought I erased that sentence, but oh well.

Humphrey still wasn't skilled offensively, not even close to Evans game. Again, notice Evans only played in 2 games that year. Had he been healthy, Humphrey is a role player who starts a few games here and there.

I don't have a big issue with the notion that BJE was more skilled than Humphrey (he was not more skilled than Najera) but skill is only part of the equation. That is why Humphrey was a first team USA today HS All American, that is also why Humphrey was more productive and why he was ultimately a 1st round draft pick.
 
I don't have a big issue with the notion that BJE was more skilled than Humphrey (he was not more skilled than Najera) but skill is only part of the equation. That is why Humphrey was a first team USA today HS All American, that is also why Humphrey was more productive and why he was ultimately a 1st round draft pick.

He was a 1st round draft pick based on his potential.

He was a usa today AA because he physically dominated in Oklahoma without anybody who was close to his dimensions and physicality.

I'd still take BJE in a game of 1-on-1 any day.
 
He was a 1st round draft pick based on his potential.

He was a usa today AA because he physically dominated in Oklahoma without anybody who was close to his dimensions and physicality.

I'd still take BJE in a game of 1-on-1 any day.

Thanks for clearing that up I never knew until just now.
 
Thanks for clearing that up I never knew until just now.

In your previous post you used these accolades to prove your point Humphrey was more skilled than Evans. So, obviously, you didn't know it until just now.
 
In your previous post you used these accolades to prove your point Humphrey was more skilled than Evans. So, obviously, you didn't know it until just now.

That's not what I said, I said BJE may have been more skilled, but skill isn't the whole equation. C'mon man.

Ron Seikaly, was more skilled than Shaq but again skill isn't the whole equation.
 
Good, great. I don't need a reputation. I'm not trying to win any top poster award. You're trying to make Cade out to be something he's not. Cade is a good college player, you're trying to make him out to be a candidate for NCAA player of the year. He's OU's best player and that's part of the reason the team is 12-16 (yes I know it's officially 15). On a successful team like Sampson's or the Blake years, he's average at best.

I haven't made any of these arguments, all I have argued is that Cade is more than just a 3pt shooter.

I can't believe that you aren't going for the top poster award, everyone else is. Plus when I was in high school I once posted with the top poster and I wasnt scared at all.
 
That's not what I said, I said BJE may have been more skilled, but skill isn't the whole equation. C'mon man.

Ron Seikaly, was more skilled than Shaq but again skill isn't the whole equation.

I guess it depends on your definition of "skill". Offensively? Defensively?

You guys have stated that BJE is more skilled than Hump. Defensively and rebounding, BJE couldn't carry Hump's jock. Again, you have to consider what they were (healthy, injured, overweight, or whatever) when trying to determine the better player.
 
I guess it depends on your definition of "skill". Offensively? Defensively?

You guys have stated that BJE is more skilled than Hump. Defensively and rebounding, BJE couldn't carry Hump's jock. Again, you have to consider what they were (healthy, injured, overweight, or whatever) when trying to determine the better player.

Hump couldn't carry BJE's jock offensively. That's what I'm talking about. BJE would have given us a different dimension at the post position when we had to settle for Renzi Stone.
 
Can we please leave talk of posters supposed athletic ability to PM's or the smack board?
 
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbS7O5diAAE[/ame]

Looking at 1998, who's spot would Cade take?
 
Y'all quit arguing. We have a gayhawk with an ugly woman to ridicule.
 
Everything's good now. Competitive people disagreed. I apologize for my role in the above postings.
 
Back
Top