10 points
6 assists
3 turnovers
3 steals
40% from the field
28% from 3
He has the oop pass to Clark down.
If Osby is as good as Capel says he is and if Goff is solid, we COULD be much improved next year with the way Blair is coming around.
If Osby is as good as Capel says he is and if Goff is solid, we COULD be much improved next year with the way Blair is coming around.
Im just worried that Goff isn't going to be able to just come in and dominate at the 5. Hope I'm wrong though. I hope we take another big (but one unlike Nick Thompson).
Im just worried that Goff isn't going to be able to just come in and dominate at the 5. Hope I'm wrong though. I hope we take another big (but one unlike Nick Thompson).
I actually like the odds for Goff to start over Fitz. He should bring better rebounding and blocking to the table. Goff from all signs is an high level athlete and after this season I would like to see a lot more of that on the court.Well, look at it this way, and this is along the lines of what Bounce said above. Osby, and more than likely even Goff, push your boy toy NickyT to the end of the bench next year. Osby, if he has half the pulse Capel seems to think he has, starting at the 4 and Fitz starting at the 5 is a remarkable improvement to the Fitz-Thompson combo we saw for 30 minutes tonight. It's a start.
Im just worried that Goff isn't going to be able to just come in and dominate at the 5. Hope I'm wrong though. I hope we take another big (but one unlike Nick Thompson).
Im just worried that Goff isn't going to be able to just come in and dominate at the 5. Hope I'm wrong though. I hope we take another big (but one unlike Nick Thompson).
If Goff doesn't start over Fitz, I will be shocked. And worried.
Then again, Perry Jones Three averaged 12 and 8 in high school and will be a top 5 pick. He was awesome tonight.
I actually like the odds for Goff to start over Fitz. He should bring better rebounding and blocking to the table. Goff from all signs is an high level athlete and after this season I would like to see a lot more of that on the court.
I am still not 100% sold that blair should be our PG next year simply because he is a terrible 3 point shooter. I would rather see a good 3 point shooter at the point, but I suppose lots of teams would like to have that.
I will have to admit though that he is playing much better, even better then I thought he was capable of. Regardless if he starts next year or not, or will be a productive player.
I am still not 100% sold that blair should be our PG next year simply because he is a terrible 3 point shooter. I would rather see a good 3 point shooter at the point, but I suppose lots of teams would like to have that.
I will have to admit though that he is playing much better, even better then I thought he was capable of. Regardless if he starts next year or not, or will be a productive player.
Carl is not as bad as you might think from behind the arc. Truth is, no one on the team except Thompson and Neal are averaging 40% or better, and that's on a limited number of shots from three. Check out the averages and you'll see what I mean:
http://www.soonersports.com/sports/m-baskbl/stats/2010-2011/teamcume.html
I agree, though, it would be nice to have a point guard who is a threat to score from long range. Guererro appears to be that kind of player, which is why I'm hoping he'll choose OU and give us that option next season.