NickZepp
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2008
- Messages
- 14,008
- Reaction score
- 1,426
Nick - I think the young guys were as good as expected. The problem with this team is the "old" guys.
OU got nothing out of WWIII this year - at least nothing positive
Crocker was typical Crocker - Mr. Rollercoaster
Ryan Wright played good once or twice
These were the guys, IMO, OU needed to have a great years to be successful. I really didn't expect TMG to be this good - even though he has done little of late, I chalk that up to fatigue
Tiny was typical freshman - good and bad. Foul trouble plauged him early, but he really improved, I thought, as the season progressed
Pledge and Fitz both showed flashes.
It was the "veterans" on this team which were the biggest disappointment to me.
None of the young guys really played well at the same time.
Pledger only played good the first few games this year. After that he basically did nothing on offense had some good defense at times, and some bad defense at other times
Fitzgerald showed up a bit early in the year. Mostly disappeared till later in the year and then played well near the end of the year.
Gallon played well till about the start of Big 12 play then disappears till the last 3 or 4 games of Big 12 play. He never really played good defense for the most part.
TMG didn't really do much till conference play then disappeared at the end of conference play.
None of the freshmen really played well at the same time. You never knew who was going to be our best player game in and game out all year. You would have certain things you know would show up. Cade Davis' hustle for example. Gallon was usually a decent rebounder and he would usually get in foul trouble. Tony would play hard when healthy. That's really about it. You never knew who would show up from game to game for the rest of the team.