I find it interesting that the budget has only been significant to the party not in power. A balanced budget seems to elude any party while it is achieving its goals, and it doesn't mean that we should stop spending, just that we should stop spending on the other party's agenda. I think at least a few people are figuring that out. We just had a balanced budget President put an entire war on the debtor list. Meanwhile, China isn't going to be asking us to pay anything back. Their growth is dependent upon our purchasing. They'll eat the debt themselves before they let it affect their market, without which they are nothing.
Want to balance the budget? Make the companies that left the US pay import taxes to get their products back in the US---or ban them.
Carson and Trump are such lightweights that they don't merit discussion. A lot of people are angry right now, primarily because the news media from all sides is talking about what's wrong and scandals. That's where the money is, controversy. We would be OK if it weren't for--------------blame it and name it. It is somewhat interesting that some of the original tea party, the ones that began before Armey took it over, are beginning to talk to Elizabeth Warren and Sanders. Their original objection was about Wall Street before the movement was highjacked from them. But, the country is simply dancing with the loudest voice, not the most productive. I have yet to see one poll that says that Trump or Carson could win a general election, even a Republican poll. I think that they are lightning rods for the anger. In some respects, Sanders is a lightning rod for dissatisfied progressives. But, none will be President. I suspect that it will be Hillary. I would probably fear Kasich most as an opponent. I think everyone else has too much baggage. You tube can make for interesting campaigns.