hoopsaustin
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2008
- Messages
- 11,726
- Reaction score
- 4,765
You are crazy imo calling Loser a "good coach". Based on what?Fire the coach mid season for losing a couple SEC games, only 4 games into conference play, -- some of you guys just kill me. That is so wrong and irresponsible as to be hard to believe you would post it. Quit on a team, and they will quit on you. You don't have to like Moser, or think he is a good coach, but he has never had an OU team quit on him. This won't either unless the University quits on them. BTW, firing Moser means a lot of good people lose their jobs. Knowing they won't be here, they will certainly mail it in. If after the season, they need to move on, then so be it.
As far as this season goes, I was encouraged by the Bama game. I think we are going in the right direction with this team. Playing too many kids, and with many of them missing their defensive assignments. As practice demonstrates Atak or whoever, is picking things up and willing to play better defense incorporate them back into the lineup. This approach did have us playing better defense against a great offensive team in Bama.
JMO, but I don't see the merit or reason to change coaches until and unless we get a new stadium. At this point, we are getting about the best team we can expect from a coach that makes about $3mil and a roster we are spending about $6mil on. A new coach might help, if you got the right one, but unless you are prepared to spend about $10mil for an established coach and around $15mil on NIL, you are really going to change our trajectory. Since the TV money is the same regardless of what you spend, and you guys are kidding yourselves to think you are going to significantly increase gate revenue, then why spend the money. We maximize profitability of the program (and that isn't saying much) spending what we do now.
As I have said on here several times, I'm not a big supporter of Moser nor think he is a great coach. He is a good coach with, IMO, flaws. There are plenty of coaches I would rather have. But, I want the University to be fiscally sound. With the current situation we find our selves in, i.e. free agency yearly, NIL spiraling out of control, coaches salaries spiraling out of control, declining attendance for several reasons, not just our record and the opponents we play at home, and an extremely poor stadium that makes it punishing to watch a game in person. I am surprised we spend the money we do on basketball. We might have the best we can hope for on the budget we are trying to live within.
If some of you can come up with a solution, and also explain what you think it will cost, and how we can afford it and still stay within our current budget, I am all ears. Otherwise, you are jousting with windmills.
We just completely disagree about the situation. I think plenty of other coaches could actually win more games with even LESS NIL than Loser is getting. Talent is not the issue. This team has plenty of talent to win. Loser does not push them, does not make them better, and does not put forward a winning system.
I don't want to fire him mid-season, I want him fully responsible for what he's created. Dream scenario is that his agent somehow works out a deal with some podunk small school (dangit, DePaul is actually doing decently...) and we part ways mutually