I know at the end of the day, the tourney results are probably what matters most, but I prefer to look at the season as a whole, since a team can get lucky/hot and make a decent showing in the tourney.
At this point, short of OU making an Elite 8 or FF type run, I'd probably consider it a disappointment. In large part b/c I don't feel like the program is poised to get better in future years. I feel like this was a lost year in a lot of ways as far as building our program.
^ This.If you get to hang a Sweet 16 banner in the gym, that's a success... no question about it.
If you get to hang a Sweet 16 banner in the gym, that's a success... no question about it.
If you get to hang a Sweet 16 banner in the gym, that's a success... no question about it.
1999 NCAA tourney run saved Sampson’s job
1999 NCAA tourney run saved Sampson’s job and is thought as a success so if this OU team gets in and wins two games how is this season not viewed the same?
1999 NCAA tourney run saved Sampson’s job and is thought as a success so if this OU team gets in and wins two games how is this season not viewed the same?
OU was literally the last team in the Dance (only at-large #13 seed) in 1999. If OU does not make the Dance (or loses to #4 seed Arizona), there was a 0% chance Kelvin Sampson was going to be fired. ZERO. Even though Ryan Humphrey bolted, they had both senior Eduardo Najera and Kelvin's signature guard recruit coming in - Hollis Price. He was BUILDING the program slowly, but Hollis was the signature recruit for Kelvin's best teams.
Expectations? And just an overall feel of the program and how the team played the entire season?
That ‘99 team underachieved until the NCAA tourney.