Exactly....Niang is a baller and he was on last night. I don't take it as disrespectful to Buddy or others if Niang got mentioned a little more last night....he was the best player on the court.what is so hard about accepting that Niang is a very good college player? Niang made tough shots, easy shots, every shot. He was the goods.
So Big 12 POTW is now how we distinguish what players should get pregame praise?
Some OU fans have the biggest chip on their shoulders. Both football and basketball. Act like the world is out to get them and OU. I don't understand that. Would make me want to stop following sports as closely if I felt that way.
Dude it's niang the guy is freaking good
I'm with skyvue here. As intelligent as Fran is, he was painful to listen to. Niang is amazing and certainly deserving of praise, but every single time he scored, Fran would make a comment like "WOW! If you don't have this guy on your All-America team, you're nuts! He's the best offensive player in the country! If I'm building a team, I start with him!" And when Buddy did anything, Fran simply said something like "nice move". Fran even said buddy had a "quiet 17 points" at one point. The ONLY reason it was quiet was him.
I love playing ISU. I think we have been nearly equally matched the past two seasons and the guys are so seasoned and know each other well. It's so fun to watch. But if you tuned into the game yesterday with very little knowledge of the two teams, you would've been led to believe that OU was not the same caliber team as ISU.
I think it's debatable who is having the better season so far. Buddy is obviously averaging more points per game, but there are other aspects to basketball, and ppg is a poor indicator of how well a guy is scoring it.
They are both really good players, so much so, that I'd say it is really difficult to try to distinguish between the two.
I had no problems with Fran or the play-by-play guy. They were both so much better than any broadcast with Dickie V.
Buddy has been one of the most efficient scorers in the country. Off nights will happen.Niang may not be better than Buddy, but last night he was worlds more efficient. I believe he shot around 60% from the field. Buddy needs to have better shot selection if we want to win something this year.
I suspect that if we led most of the game our players would have received similar praise.
Since Buddy was jacking up shots from all over the floor, Niang was the best player on that court yesterday. He's certainly no defensive stalwart, but Fran was only drooling over his offensive capabilities...and we had no answer for him whatsoever. I had no issues with Fran's comments since Niang backed it up. If we don't want to hear Fran raving about him next time, then it's up to the OU players to do a better job on him.
So Big 12 POTW is now how we distinguish what players should get pregame praise?
Some OU fans have the biggest chip on their shoulders. Both football and basketball. Act like the world is out to get them and OU. I don't understand that. Would make me want to stop following sports as closely if I felt that way.
I don't have a chip on my shoulder, I just thought the Niang stuff was a bit over the too. Buddy is doing more on the season than Niang Spangler had teeny points and aptwelve rebounds most of the things said about Spangler were negative or Nuetral at best Such as he won't take that shot because he missed it the first time
Denver, with all due respect, anyone reading your post for the first time would never think you're an attorney
I'm just having some fun...