Guerrero: Too good to go after or not good enough to recruit?

[CMSOONER]

Dude, you have to be a little more subtle about your trolling, no one on this board is gullible enough to believe anyone who speaks well of Hardrick's game. I'm assuming you are trolling because I don't want to imagine you're that dumb.

By the way, who on this board after watching and reading about Cezar Salad thinks he's too good for us to go after?

No recruit is too good for OU to go after. You wanna be the best you gotta go after ther best.

 

[StatGeek]

Recruiting discussions wear me out. It's all opinion and nobody knows squat. It is a complete exercise in futility. I simply cannot understand our fascination with this pseudo science. The people at Rivals, Scout, etc are either amazing salesmen or we as fans (collectively) are morons.

 

[OUGenius]

While I can't help but agree with StatGeek, my take is that while the competition he seems to be playing against looks horrible, which makes you think maybe he's not all that great, the quickness he has with the ball will still be there when he's playing against college-level guys...so that makes me think he's pretty good and will probably play a lot or start here once he adapts to the college game (which hopefully will happen very fast).

I hope we get him...

 

[campbest]

I stand with my comment.

No way in hell Hardrick is worse than Thompson, no way!

You have to be high.

 

[soonernutt]

"program-changer" is a total red herring argument. Such an argument implies we could drop guerrero and instead choose a guaranteed superstar PG at this point. We can't, so whether CG is a "program changer" is really not an issue that requires any great debate. It doesn't make any difference.

 

[Sooner918]

You have to be high.

High on optimism!

Seriously though, I've never seen Hardrick play before but since he was a 5-Star recruit at one point, he can't be worse than Thompson. Maybe I'm wrong.

 

[SoonerBounce13]

my God