Today is the day. A new head coach will be named.
Are you happy with the choice? That is if you know who it is...
Likely Moser. Possibly McCasland.
Unless Joe C. has been running smoke screens and such, those are you two choices.
Meh.
Likely Moser. Possibly McCasland.
Unless Joe C. has been running smoke screens and such, those are you two choices.
Meh.
I mean more choices but see your point.
Likely Moser. Possibly McCasland.
Unless Joe C. has been running smoke screens and such, those are you two choices.
Meh.
Who would be your reasonable top 3, ranked in order?
I'd love Kellen too but I'm not gonna say "meh" to one of, if not the hottest name in college basketball right now.
You know, Kelvin arrived here after seven seasons at Washington State without a single NCAA win. Don't underestimate what can happen when a coach is given access to better resources.If I've learned one thing over the years, it's not to let one or two runs (regular season or NCAA Tournament) paint the entire picture of a coach. I posted in another thread some of the coaches that have taken smaller schools to FF's over the past 15 years, and pretty much did nothing afterwards. Moser just doesn't fit what OU needs to have the success I want them to have. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe he would exceed my expectations. But I think his tenure at OU would look a lot like Lon's without the FF. Probably a little better league record. But I'm wanting more upside than that. I'm willing to risk failure to shoot for that upside.
Here's my hunch: It's not going to be Porter Moser or Grant McCasland.
Those guys are too easy. Joe C. has never made that hire. It's always someone else.
It's true Moser was probably a little lucky with his runs. But compare it to Kelvin Sampson, who reached the tournament exactly once and didn't win a game before coming to OU. Which would you say had better upside?If I've learned one thing over the years, it's not to let one or two runs (regular season or NCAA Tournament) paint the entire picture of a coach. I posted in another thread some of the coaches that have taken smaller schools to FF's over the past 15 years, and pretty much did nothing afterwards. Moser just doesn't fit what OU needs to have the success I want them to have. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe he would exceed my expectations. But I think his tenure at OU would look a lot like Lon's without the FF. Probably a little better league record. But I'm wanting more upside than that. I'm willing to risk failure to shoot for that upside.
It's true Moser was probably a little lucky with his runs. But compare it to Kelvin Sampson, who reached the tournament exactly once and didn't win a game before coming to OU. Which would you say had better upside?
The difference to me is age/experience.
Kelvin was what, 38 or 39 when OU hired him? 15 years of coaching experience before OU.
Moser is 52 with 31 years of coaching experience.
You tell me who likely had more room for growth as a coach.
The difference to me is age/experience.
Kelvin was what, 38 or 39 when OU hired him? 15 years of coaching experience before OU.
Moser is 52 with 31 years of coaching experience.
You tell me who likely had more room for growth as a coach.
Today is the day. A new head coach will be named.