Durant was consulted in the process, and was on board. There is no way in hell they made that move if not.
There is a huge difference between being consulted on someone else's idea for a move and being okay with it versus pushing for that move.
Durant was on board with Harden being traded. Durant was on board with Brooks being fired. That doesn't make either decision one that Durant explicitly desired. He's put a lot of trust into the OKC front office and doesn't appear to have the same thirst for decision-making power that some superstars do.
I'm not saying that Durant would leave OKC because he doesn't like Donovan, but with only one year for Donovan to acclimate himself to the league and to develop a relationship with Durant, I didn't see it as being a hire that would help tip the scales in OKC's favor.
Even if KD and Westbrook leave, you really think OKC won't bring in talented guys??? Think of all the money they would have to spend!!
Who do you think OKC is signing if KD and Westbrook leave? Look at OKC's struggles attracting high-level role players to a championship contender (i.e. Battier, Gasol).
If KD and Westbrook leave, what selling points does OKC have over other bidders? Most of the league is going to have a ton of cap space the next two summers, so money isn't a selling point unless you're willing to severely overpay role players. Harrison Barnes is going to get offers north of $20 mil per year; he'll have so many suitors (including GS, who has matching rights)with major cap space that OKC wouldn't have a shot at Barnes. Same goes for Nic Batum. At best, OKC would be able to get into bidding wars over players below the tier of those premium role players. Kent Bazemore will probably get offers of $12-15 mil per year.
i agree to a point, BUT presti did put a great staff together for Donovan
Did he? So much of coaching is behind the scenes stuff that the public doesn't see, so it makes it hard to evaluate, but given the on-court product, I don't see how it's been a great staff.
I'm not saying OKC's staff is bad, but would you say that OKC is a better coached team now than they were under Brooks? In the two seasons after the Harden trade, OKC won 60 and 59 games. Is the roster now significantly worse than it was two years ago, when Brooks went 59-23 despite Westbrook missing 36 games?