Forced turn overs, played good defense, got some easy baskets, had good ball movement and shot well.
OU looked like the better team in virtually all phases of the game except reboundings. KSU did a very good job on the offensive boards. Had KSU not worked on the boards like they did, they would have lost by 30.
OU is a solid bubble type team. If the rankings went to 100, they should be ranked in that 40-60 range. The biggest weakness is OU lacks depth. If Tyler Neal is not hitting his shot, OU really only has 6 guys that can produce points and one of them is a low scoring pg that is good for about 5ish a game. Osby, Fitzgerald and Pledger are all capable of scoring big points and dominating a game. I suspect Cam Clark has some of that in him too but he is just a sophomore and we really havent seen it much yet. Carl Blair is a kid that plays hard and can score some points but sometimes he is a low percentage scorer. After the 7 guys mentioned, OU has three post players that a limited role players. They can give minutes, rebound and defend a bit but they are unlikely to score points and none of them are dominating defenders.