Keller Sooner
New member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Messages
- 800
- Reaction score
- 0
He had me fired up. Hell, I'll go fight right now! Not sayin' I can win. :ez-laugh:
that leaves, as of today, competition between Lattin, Buford, and Manyang.
Don't forget McNease.
He is WAY too raw to compete for the starting spot next year. Minutes? Sure. But it's nearly zero percent that he will start.
He's been practicing with the team longer than Buford has. I know Buford had much more experience than McNease prior to their arrival in Norman, but unless you're there for practice every day, how can you possibly rule him out?
Have you not listened to the reports on him? Kid is RAW. Very raw. I hesitate to use the word project, but that is kind of what he is.
Stand by my comment. I don't see much of any chance he competes for a starting spot next year. And that is fine. His best days are ahead of him. Hopefully as a junior/senior starting will be an option.
He's been practicing with the team longer than Buford has. I know Buford had much more experience than McNease prior to their arrival in Norman, but unless you're there for practice every day, how can you possibly rule him out?
I don't know if McNeace has those kind of skills but if he does, don't sleep on him.
McNeace, from a pure ball skills perspective, had that far to go when he arrived at OU. I'm sure he has improved quite a bit, but the amount needed to start in the Big XII is almost insurmountable.
Just my opinion from watching him since his junior year of HS.
not the buford is going to be a 3 for sure ... but he has only practiced with the guards to this point
I've explained this before. He practices with the guards b/c even if he plays the 4, he is going to do so with a guard skill set. Kind of like Cam. It wouldn't make sense to have him practicing post moves, b/c he is never going to do that. Not even if he is playing the 4.
I'm not against the idea that down the road Buford could play the 3. And maybe, just maybe, that is next year IF Buddy leaves. But I think he is the ideal 4 in today's game. Especially for a team that wants to run on offense, and play pressure/switching D on that end. It only makes sense.
I don't know, either, and I didn't in any way intend to be equating the two players' abilities. I don't pretend to be a great judge of talent; I was a terrible athlete in school (still am) and so my connection to sports has always been strictly as a fan. I played very little, I never coached (as if), I never officiated. I'm strictly an inexpert observer and have never pretended otherwise.
But I hate to see any of our student-athletes dismissed by our fans, and I've seen enough players pleasantly surprise to take a wait-and-see attitude on all our scholarship athletes, McNeace included. Coach K saw something in him or he wouldn't have signed him. Who's to say when he'll start to rise to the level Coach Kruger saw in him?