Did it disrupt Kansas bringing in Coleby(TR), Diallo(top 25 recruit) along with Bragg(top 25 recruit) when you have Ellis, Traylor, Lucas, and Mickelson already on the team? Did it disrupt to bring in Vick(top 50 recruit) when you already have Mason, Graham, Greene, Selden, and Mykhailiuk?
You talk about the best trio. That trio did not beat KU this year for a big 12 championship. They recruit top 100 athletes and add them their lineup and thats why they win championships. They don't leave scholarships available when there is a talented kid they can bring in no matter what future recruits they are in on.
We can also keep talking about why Kansas keeps winning big 12 championships.
Kansas has how many big 12 championships in a row? How many scholarships do they have available this year? They don't seem to be hurting with post depth but they brought in Coleby to redshirt and they've already added another big to their team from this class.
I don't have a strong opinion on whether or not OU should pursue Jolly, but I wouldn't base it on "What would Kansas do?"
Let's be honest: OU basketball isn't on KU basketball's level. Those programs face different realities. I'm sure KU's decisions, including their recruiting approach, are partly influenced by the strong possibility that some of their recruits could realistically jump to the NBA after one or two years of college. Conversely, OU was fortunate just to have one player who was good enough to contemplate leaving after three years as a borderline first round pick.
If you're a typical blue-chip recruit, what do you want in a school? You probably want to go to a prestigious basketball program that has a good NBA draft track record, and/or you want playing time. A program like KU can load a bunch of players at the same position across one or two classes and still land elite recruits because they have so much else to sell to those players. OU doesn't enjoy that luxury. The way KU's program is built, something like roster balance isn't as much of an issue as it is at OU.
I'm not trying to dump on our program in any way. OU's goal--and it's a reasonable one--should be to win the Big 12 and to beat Kansas, but it's not going to happen by taking KU's approach to building a program.
As I said, I don't have a strong opinion on Jolly and OU, but as a borderline Top 100 recruit, it doesn't appear as if he's being valued as a must-take recruit for a program like OU. To be clear, I'm not saying that he's not good enough; rather, in that range, the differences between recruits are small enough that it's quite possible that Kruger or some other coach prefers the #200 recruit in the country to the #100 recruit. If we were talking about a consensus Top 50 kid, you would have a stronger case.
I wouldn't be surprised if OU did or didn't want Jolly. He may be talented enough for OU, but is he a must-take? You have to weigh his talent versus what OU already has on deck and decide if it's worth not having that scholarship available--not just to pursue future HS recruits, but to take in potential transfers as well (i.e. Grandstaff).