TopherB560
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2024
- Messages
- 524
- Reaction score
- 1,140
Agreed. And it’s sad that it took Moser 90% into the season to start Soares over Oweh when it was pretty clear by conference time he was better.
A shit ton.How many freaking former 5 stars do they have?
So the guys who were in the system the longest developed the least? Great talking pointHopefully OU is really pushing the narrative of how sores and Moore were developed at OU. It doesn’t get talked about enough. For as much as oweh and Los disappointed, soares and Moore excelled
More like two guys that were sort of written off from where they came from could excel in Moser's system........something like that.So the guys who were in the system the longest developed the least? Great talking point
Which is fair -- Moser/the staff should get credit for that. The problem is, whether transfers or high school guys, they are about the only two we can point to. Tanner, Jacob, Noland, Los, Oweh, Bijan, JM, Yaya, etc. -- far more guys have regressed or pretty much stayed the same after arriving in Norman.More like two guys that were sort of written off from where they came from could excel in Moser's system........something like that.
Waldo and Moore, but mostly Soares, were not our best basketball players November-January. We had several. JMac and Oweh as much as anyone. Waldo took a while to get going, too. Moore had flashes, but was not consistent early. And no doubt Moore is a better athlete than basketball player, and probably the same for Waldo, too.Waldo and Moore were not raw athletes who lacked basketball IQ. They were our best players. I agree that sometimes teams with great athletes struggle because they lack skill or basketball smarts, but Soares and Moore absolutely don’t fit in that category. Both those guys had very nice all around games, and they also played incredibly hard. Neither is a great ball handler, but I don’t recall either of them making a lot of “dumb” mistakes.
You know how sales and marketing work, right?So the guys who were in the system the longest developed the least? Great talking point
Yeah the ONLY other way to spin it in a somewhat positive manner is to say that the staff that helped those guys develop last year was fully retained. There's no doubt (or shouldn't be) that this is Moser's last year with another sub-par season (missing the NCAA tourney). BUT if they can convince a few guys (Pedulla and Garrison) to come on board and guys that were left from last year do develop as you hope, and they make the tournament then you have some positive momentum till you hit the offseason and it all blows up for no reason again next year.Which is fair -- Moser/the staff should get credit for that. The problem is, whether transfers or high school guys, they are about the only two we can point to. Tanner, Jacob, Noland, Los, Oweh, Bijan, JM, Yaya, etc. -- far more guys have regressed or pretty much stayed the same after arriving in Norman.
Yes and can you imagine the laughter if you told someone, "Look at how these 2 guys developed!" "What about the other guys?" "No, just these two, do not look behind this curtain, 2 only!"You know how sales and marketing work, right?
They obviously aren't getting developed
I cannot envision a world in which we miss the tournament again and Moser is back.I understand what you mean about not wanting to see OU fail. But if you have two options: (1) OU suffers through a 14-18 season and Moser gets canned and OU can start the process of undoing the damage of the past four years, or (2) OU goes 19-13, misses the tourney, but Joe keeps him -- I would opt for the short term pain. Now, I would much prefer to just make the tourney next season, but right now, I don't know how even the biggest Moser stan can be optimistic we will make the tourney. I mean, the biggest reasons for optimism coming into last season were (1) Los/Oweh returning and making a leap, and (2) the increased athleticism, which mainly was from Waldo, Moore, and Cooper. Three of those five are gone, and of the remaining two, one barely saw the floor and the other is not yet a sure thing to return (I could still see him going to the portal).
Agreed. Doesn't matter the challenges he or any coach will face from the lack of overall support, he won't be back nor deserve to be back. Even if they are the first out again.I cannot envision a world in which we miss the tournament again and Moser is back.
This assumes he can find someone better to replace himI cannot envision a world in which we miss the tournament again and Moser is back.
Which is why I find it hard to believe he’s going to keep Keita. If I were on the verge of being fired, I would want to give myself the best possible chance to succeed, and wasting a scholarship isn’t a great plan, imo.
I can. As I said earlier. If the NIL money isn't available for PM to buy good players and keep them around, you can't blame him for the results.I cannot envision a world in which we miss the tournament again and Moser is back.
Duke has seven guys in the portal. Ouch
Yeah, those dudes.............probably pee sitting down.And some still think it isn’t about the money..