NCAA Tourney the Thread

[TarheelstateSooner]

You've defended them like crazy, so yeah I'm pretty sure it's your team. Which is fine, you're just acting like a 12 year old. Bacot has been better than McCormick, but McCormick was better that night.

No. I just hate Kansas. I disagree. I think Braun and Remi Martin were better than Love and Davis. But I do not think McCormick was better than Bacot. Not even close.

 

[BoulderSooner]

Not really, UNC had someone step up every night as posted by other people. Davis & Manek vs Baylor, Love in the Elite 8 & Final 4, Bacot was very good though. If UNC would've won I'd say Love probably would've gotten MOP.

or brady ..

love with his 20 point second halfs won the UCLA and duke games . .

 

[BCSooners]

Carolina had 15 offensive rebounds vs UCLA. Outrebounded UCLA by 9. I would argue RJ Davis was more impactful vs Baylor (he had 30). Manek was out 10 minutes left in the 2nd half. Bacot had 15 and 16 with 3 blocks vs Baylor. I guess that's just awful? UNC had 24 offensive rebounds vs Kansas to Kansas 8. Bacot had 10 points and 21 rebounds vs Duke. I'm not going to continue this. As Manek wasn't consistent through the Tournament like Bacot was. Neither was Love (sucked vs Baylor and Kansas). Love, Manek, and Davis were all bad vs Saint Peters. You know who wasn't? Bacot. Keep pushing that God awful narrative though. Again. Broke the record for double doubles in the Tournament. That within itself should be enough.

Who has said he was awful? He just didn't dominate McCormick like you said he would.

 

[BoulderSooner]

No. I just hate Kansas. I disagree. I think Braun and Remi Martin were better than Love and Davis. But I do not think McCormick was better than Bacot. Not even close.

then you don't know basketball

 

[TarheelstateSooner]

4-10 for your center is awuful and he was 7-15 from the line

HAHA. My goodness this is sad. Bacot was the most consistent player in the Tournament points and rebounds wise and dominated on the boards. But yet, he shot bad and that's your go to? Woof.

 

[BoulderSooner]

ncaa tourney stats ..

18.83 ppg 8.33 RB 1.5 Blocks on 54.2/47.8/71.4 shooting 1.3 turnovers

or 15.3 ppg 14.83 RB 1.5 Blocks on 42.2/0.0/59.2 shooting and 2.0 turnovers

everyone pretty much would take the first guy

by the way the first player is brady in this tourney ..

those are elite numbers ...

the second player is a great rebounder and a sub par offensive player ..

 

[TarheelstateSooner]

then you don't know basketball

Yeah, because Bacot didn't have more rebounds and literally kept UNC in the game by himself with his offensive rebounds. You saying he's not the best player in the Tournament while he broke 30 year old records. Makes me question if you know basketball. LOL.

 

[BoulderSooner]

HAHA. My goodness this is sad. Bacot was the most consistent player in the Tournament points and rebounds wise and dominated on the boards. But yet, he shot bad and that's your go to? Woof.

high volume center shooter that shoots 42% and 59 from the line is very very bad ..

 

[TarheelstateSooner]

by the way the first player is brady in this tourney ..

those are elite numbers ...

the second player is a great rebounder and a sub par offensive player ..

You're right. Manek broke records and tied records set by Tim Duncan and David Robinson. I'm sure people would like to have Manek defend centers inside over Bacot.

 

[TarheelstateSooner]

high volume center shooter that shoots 42% and 59 from the line is very very bad ..

If your go to is shooting percentage, and free throw line for a guy that finished All-ACC, All Regional Tournament 1st team, and All Tournament first team. You've lost the argument. Agbachi averaged less points than Bacot in the Tournament and he won Player of the Tournament. I guess he sucked too huh?

 

[TarheelstateSooner]

Who has said he was awful? He just didn't dominate McCormick like you said he would.

I also said if he's at least 95%. Which he wasn't. You ignoring that point too huh?

 

[BCSooners]

I also said if he's at least 95%. Which he wasn't. You ignoring that point too huh?

Again, who said he was awful?