Hollisp
New member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 889
- Reaction score
- 0
Good back and forth in this convo guys.
Again, my opinion is that even if he was "not getting open" he still should have been in the game for the final play. LK said the play was designed for Grooms to penetrate and shoot if open or kick if guarded. Who better to kick it to that Pledger.
I also wonder what this does for his confidence going forward. A sr sitting the bench at home during crunch time cant help. Yes I realize he was playing poorly and Im not trying to defend his poor play. Its just worrisome for his psyche. It will be interesting to see how he reacts agasint ISU.
Again, my opinion is that even if he was "not getting open" he still should have been in the game for the final play. LK said the play was designed for Grooms to penetrate and shoot if open or kick if guarded. Who better to kick it to that Pledger.
I also wonder what this does for his confidence going forward. A sr sitting the bench at home during crunch time cant help. Yes I realize he was playing poorly and Im not trying to defend his poor play. Its just worrisome for his psyche. It will be interesting to see how he reacts agasint ISU.