Selection committee

[TINY]

Apparently they think the pac 12 is tougher than the big12. Usc, Oregon seeded higher and they don’t even have a top 25 win.

 

[WTSooner]

STOP!

OU did this to themselves. You can't lose 5 of your last 6, one of those to a 7-18 KSU team, and expect any better. We deserved the worst seed of the Big 12 teams.

 

[thebigabd]

STOP!

OU did this to themselves. You can't lose 5 of your last 6, one of those to a 7-18 KSU team, and expect any better. We deserved the worst seed of the Big 12 teams.

This..... Nothin else to be said.

 

[MrAnderson]

The committee did a piss poor job imo, but OU has no one to blame but themselves. We just dont have the talent to play at a high level consistently.

 

[sheepdogs1]

STOP!

OU did this to themselves. You can't lose 5 of your last 6, one of those to a 7-18 KSU team, and expect any better. We deserved the worst seed of the Big 12 teams.

You forgot to mention the one team which we did defeat.

 

[TINY]

STOP!

OU did this to themselves. You can't lose 5 of your last 6, one of those to a 7-18 KSU team, and expect any better. We deserved the worst seed of the Big 12 teams.

What does that have to do with the pac 12 getting rewarded for mediocrity? Our last 6 games featured 4 opponents who are all better than anyone in the pac.

 

[BoulderSooner]

This is correct

 

[MichaelM]

The committee says - and as far as I know they've never said this before - that once you were picked for the tournament, your wins and losses no longer mattered and it's all about your efficiency per KenPom and other predictive metrics. So OU's four Q1A wins didn't make much difference, nor did OSU's tear through the Big 12 tournament, since their metrics from the early season were so poor that they still ended up 30th in KenPom.

You're better off destroying a bad schedule than barely beating/losing to good teams.

Source:[TWEET]https://twitter.com/jeffborzello/status/1371269727138500611[/TWEET]

 

[hoopsaustin]

The committee says - and as far as I know they've never said this before - that once you were picked for the tournament, your wins and losses no longer mattered and it's all about your efficiency per KenPom and other predictive metrics. So OU's four Q1A wins didn't make much difference, nor did OSU's tear through the Big 12 tournament, since their metrics from the early season were so poor that they still ended up 30th in KenPom.

You're better off destroying a bad schedule than barely beating/losing to good teams.

Source:[TWEET]https://twitter.com/jeffborzello/status/1371269727138500611[/TWEET]

That's dumb AF IMO. Predictive? Meh. Dole out what the teams earned in season, not what they "could" do..

 

[MrAnderson]

The committee says - and as far as I know they've never said this before - that once you were picked for the tournament, your wins and losses no longer mattered and it's all about your efficiency per KenPom and other predictive metrics. So OU's four Q1A wins didn't make much difference, nor did OSU's tear through the Big 12 tournament, since their metrics from the early season were so poor that they still ended up 30th in KenPom.

You're better off destroying a bad schedule than barely beating/losing to good teams.

Source:[TWEET]https://twitter.com/jeffborzello/status/1371269727138500611[/TWEET]

By this logic Wisconsin and Loyola-Chicago should both be top 3-4 seeds, since Kenpom has them in his top 10, while OSU, WV and Texas are actually over seeded.

 

[TINY]

That’s fine in a normal year but not in a year like this year when every schedule was uneven. In atypical years you might need more human intervention due to the nuance of a covid year. Ncaa is dumb af.