Probably unreasonable to expect Sherri to keep her roster full at 15 scholarship players at all times because of the complexity of recruiting and the inability to get all the players you target.
However the logic of maintaining a roster of 13-14 quality player is more than reasonable and obtainable with the proper plan in place. Unless we forget Kodi Morrison being recruited from the rowing team in 2009-10 to permit Sherri having enough players to scrimmage in practice we know Sherri's roster has been a little thin on previous occasions when trying to exist with a 12 man roster or less. Basically this is avoidable with the right plan.
Moreover a basketball school of the caliber of OU should have a recruiting strategy with plan A, plan B and plan C wherein there was a quality player available and waiting in the wings on an offer when a targeted #10-20 player is lost in the recruiting battle. To put all of your eggs in one basket is foolish when injuries, suspensions and transfers mount up. And they do mount up on occasions.
It might be as simple as targeting 2/3 players for one scholarship and telling all of them the first player to commit gets the scholarship. It is done all the time in men's basketball and football. I am reasonably certain that UConn, Stanford, Notre Dame and Tennessee practice the same only holding a scholarship for a single player when they are top 5 or labeled "must get" by the coaching staff.
This was a really great post, I think someone posted here that Imani Wright had a interest in OU but that OU wasn't interested in her? it could have been that we had 2 other guard commits and that the Staff liked what Raigyne Moncrief had to offer more kind of like putting all there eggs in one basket.