Sweet 16 games

[WichitaSooner]

would appear so but being an old I can remember a few Semi's like this that seemed like the defacto championship game only to see the winner fall flat on Monday. Unfortunately the primary one would be OU-Arizona in '88. Thought for sure the winner of that would breeze to the title. Others that come to mind are Houston-Lousiville in '83 which was a great 1 vs 2 matchup followed by the unforgettable NC State win over Houston in the NC. A few years later in '85 it was the Georgetown - St Johns semi , the year that Villanova then shocked the Hoyas. Our Sooners were oh so close to getting Villanova in the semi's but lost a heart breaker to Memphis St. in Dallas at the Elite 8

Good examples. On the other hand, we benefited in 2002, because if they reseeded, we wouldn't have played Indiana. We would have been the third seed in that FF, so we would have played either Maryland or KU (can't recall which of them was the higher on the overall seed list that year). Obviously we could have beaten either (since we already had), but Indiana was definitely the weakest of the teams in Atlanta that year.

 

[WaymanFan]

i didn't know that this was not known

Perhaps it is known by some, just not me.

I read the book "The Undefeated" by Jim Dent which was all about OU's 47-game football winning streak back in the 1950s. It was mentioned that OU built their football tradition shortly after WWII when they hired Jim Tatum (who had an assistant named Bud Wilkinson). The rich oil tycoons in the state of Oklahoma wanted desperately to be a dominant football school. The guys coming back from the war were already in their 20s and already had a wife and kids. They needed MONEY more than an education. A large slush fund was created for this purpose. I guess it was karma in that (also mentioned in the book) Notre Dame sent over a player to be a spy the week of the game that ended the 47-game streak. This player "committed" to play for OU and then attended every practice that week. When ND went up 7-0 in the 4th quarter, OU assistant Gomer Jones yelled out, "they know our plays!" He then looked at the ND sidelines and saw their new "commit" celebrating after ND took the lead.

That was the long, drawn-out explanation that schools sometimes cheat .

 

[mict085]

I don’t know about the first part. Izzo. Pitino. Kelvin. Self. Painter. I can’t think of many elite coaches who constantly berate officials and whine like a baby in press conferences.

LOL. All notorious assholes. Can be compete jerks and have been yet act like they invented the game and are above it all. Great coaches but spare me the revisionist history about their prickly nature.

 

[WichitaSooner]

LOL. All notorious assholes. Can be compete jerks and have been yet act like they invented the game and are above it all. Great coaches but spare me the revisionist history about their prickly nature.

So it’s a coincidence that most media members like those guys and Hurley is the one who gets constantly bashed as a complete jerk? Or that he probably has more technicals than the rest of those guys combined over the past few years? And I don’t think you know what the phrase revisionist history means. Last I checked, it doesn’t apply when someone is referring to something ongoing. Pretty sure all the guys I named are still alive and, in fact, coaching. If you can find many examples of people calling those guys assholes, I’d love to see it. Pitino has his critics for off the court stuff and can be prickly, but he doesn’t belittle officials at every opportunity and flail around on the sidelines. Kelvin, Self, and Izzo are probably three of the most liked coaches by media members because of how good an interview they are, and I’ve never heard anyone say anything negative about Painter in any context. But sure, they are all just like Hurley.