toss up

Joined
Jun 1, 2010
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
Would you rather land one dominant big man (Randle) or two really good guards ( Parker & Woodard)
 
The 2 guards! I wasn't that impressed with Randle to take him over those 2 guards.
 
I would want whoever is excited to play for OU. I think mindset and attitude have a lot to do with young adult's success.
 
The 2 guards! I wasn't that impressed with Randle to take him over those 2 guards.
Randle is the second best high school player in the nation right now and is a program changer.
 
Honestly, OU needs both a pg and a pf/c in this class. OU absolutely has to land a pg.
 
Randle is the second best high school player in the nation right now and is a program changer.

I definitely don't want to get an argument with you, because you know more about this than I do, but I would just prefer to have those in-state players. Both could be program changers.
 
I agree about having a dominant big man... look at the impact Blake had at OU.
 
Can we have a solid four-year contributor out of any of them? I choose that one.
 
I take Randle. He has Blake like talent. Will be a Lottery selection. Capel got Willie, TMG, and Tiny off of Blake and his talents. I think that Kruger would be able to be a better character judge that Capel and get the type of players that keep this program relevant for a long, long time. I think Randle is the tyoe of kid that other players want to play with.
 
My politically correct answer is, we need them all! I wouldn't want to pass on a talent like Julius Randle under any circumstances. At the same time, OU would be dealt a huge blow if we lost Woodward and Parker.

But given a choice with no other option available, I would take the instate kids in a heart beat. There is no substitute for playing at home in front of family and friends, with pride of school and state as your primary focus.
 
Back
Top